ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
On the Probability of Reaching High Peaks in Fitness Landscapes by Adaptive Walks.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomes From 117 Vertebrate Species Reveal Rapidly Evolving Segmental-Duplication Landscapes.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- How far can you go? Extrapolating values of catalytic activity from known protein landscapes in natural and directed evolution.Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- Predicting the topography of fitness landscapes from the structure of genotype-phenotype maps.Genetics · 2026Article
- Inference and Visualization of Complex Genotype-Phenotype Maps.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomes from 117 vertebrate species reveal rapidly evolving segmental duplication landscapes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Inference and visualization of complex genotype-phenotype maps withbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptive evolution can be described by an uphill walk in a fitness landscape. However, climbing the global peak in a multipeak landscape is improbable because of the high chance of being trapped at a local peak. Nonetheless, over three-quarters of simulated adaptive walks in the fitness landscape of the Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene were reported to end at the highest 14% of peaks, suggesting that biological systems may be substantially more evolvable than commonly thought. To investigate the cause and generality of this observation, we estimate in empirical and theoretical fitness landscapes the probability of reaching high peaks by adaptive walks (PHP), where high peaks refer to the highest 1, 5, 14, or 25% of all peaks. We find that (i) PHP varies substantially among landscapes, (ii) PHP in empirical landscapes is generally comparable to or smaller than that in same-size Rough Mount Fuji landscapes of similar ruggedness, and (iii) lowering landscape ruggedness boosts PHP. As observed in DHFR, we find in every examined landscape a positive correlation between the fitness of a peak and its basin size, which is the number of genotypes that can reach the peak through adaptive walks. Yet, this correlation does not guarantee a large PHP because of the influences of other factors. We conclude that evolvability depends on the specific fitness landscape and that the large PHP in the DHFR landscape is not a general property of empirical or theoretical fitness landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.