ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
A Neutral Risk Framework for Active Participation Across the Lifespan: A Call to Action for Using Risk in Movement Contexts as a Tool for Human Flourishing.
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional risk management approaches focus on the prevention of negative short-term physical outcomes, such as injury. While the relationship between risk and harm has been useful for reducing workplace and transport injuries, it is inappropriate in movement contexts such as sport, leisure and education, where engagement with risk can be an important contributor to healthy human development and flourishing across the lifespan. We propose a neutral definition of risk informed by the 2009 International Organization for Standardization as the basis of a framework to support a rational approach to decision making around risk in movement contexts. The framework proposed herein considers the probability of all potential outcomes (positive, neutral, or negative) that could impact human development across the lifespan. Viewpoints from multiple timepoints (immediate to multi-generational) and levels (participant(s), proximal observers, local community, society) are included. The framework proposes two outcome streams: physical and psychosocial to avoid the pitfalls of a singular focus. The perception of risk is an individual experience that is subject to interpretation; as such, stakeholders relevant to the activity under consideration and representative of the intersectional identities of the community in which it takes place should be included in the process. This framework provides a rational approach for movement communities to adopt adequate safety practices (as opposed to surplus safety) in the creation and ongoing maintenance of movement opportunities that support flourishing for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40120072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.