ArticleCJEM2025
Does a Targeted Engagement and Diversion program reduce emergency department utilization?
Article in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Service use and program-level impacts of a collaborative hospital-community emergency department diversion program for people experiencing alcohol and opioid intoxication.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe Targeted Engagement and Diversion (TED) program in Ottawa provides health care to unhoused or shelter/community housed adults outside of an emergency department (ED) setting. We sought to determine the proportion of patients diverted away from the ED by the TED program.
methodsWe conducted a health records review of adult patients who visited the TED program from January to December 2022 using random sampling to account for seasonal variation. Data were extracted from the Ottawa Inner City Health database and hospital records from two university-affiliated EDs. The primary outcome was successful diversion from the ED, defined as any of the following: TED program patients (i) presenting in the evening or overnight; (ii) brought in by police/paramedic services; (iii) referred from the safe consumption site; (iv) assessed by a nurse or physician; (v) admitted for higher level of observation; or (vi) that received an antidote (e.g., naloxone). Data were described using descriptive statistics.
resultsWe reviewed 500 total visits of 241 unique patients (76.3% male, median age 38 years). The most common reason for presentation was unspecified intoxication (83.4%, n = 417). A total of 359 visits met criteria for successful diversion from the ED (71.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 67.7-75.6). Most patients who met diversion criteria revisited the TED program within 7 days (82.8%, n = 323), whereas 7.9% (n = 31) visited an ED within 7 days. At 2 years, 39% (n = 94) of all patients were stably housed and 10.8% (n = 26) died.
conclusionThe TED program may be successful at attracting patients and diverting their care away from busy local EDs, and few patients treated by the TED program visited the ED within the subsequent 7 days. This model of care may provide a solution to offload from overcrowded EDs and improve access to comprehensive care for patients who are unhoused.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40120066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.