Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40120066›Full record

ArticleCJEM2025

Does a Targeted Engagement and Diversion program reduce emergency department utilization?

Rebecca Seliga, Krishan Yadav, Caroline Hodgins, Maria Jaramillo, Christina Masters, Jamie Muckle, Marie-Joe Nemnom, Ariel Hendin, Debra Eagles, Rakesh Patel

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebecca SeligaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada. rseliga@toh.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1229-4897
Krishan YadavDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Caroline Hodgins *Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Maria Jaramillo *Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Christina MastersOttawa Inner City Health, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jamie MuckleOttawa Inner City Health, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Marie-Joe NemnomOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ariel Hendin *Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Debra Eagles *Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Rakesh PatelOttawa Inner City Health, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Targeted Engagement and Diversion (TED) program in Ottawa provides health care to unhoused or shelter/community housed adults outside of an emergency department (ED) setting. We sought to determine the proportion of patients diverted away from the ED by the TED program.

methodsWe conducted a health records review of adult patients who visited the TED program from January to December 2022 using random sampling to account for seasonal variation. Data were extracted from the Ottawa Inner City Health database and hospital records from two university-affiliated EDs. The primary outcome was successful diversion from the ED, defined as any of the following: TED program patients (i) presenting in the evening or overnight; (ii) brought in by police/paramedic services; (iii) referred from the safe consumption site; (iv) assessed by a nurse or physician; (v) admitted for higher level of observation; or (vi) that received an antidote (e.g., naloxone). Data were described using descriptive statistics.

resultsWe reviewed 500 total visits of 241 unique patients (76.3% male, median age 38 years). The most common reason for presentation was unspecified intoxication (83.4%, n = 417). A total of 359 visits met criteria for successful diversion from the ED (71.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 67.7-75.6). Most patients who met diversion criteria revisited the TED program within 7 days (82.8%, n = 323), whereas 7.9% (n = 31) visited an ED within 7 days. At 2 years, 39% (n = 94) of all patients were stably housed and 10.8% (n = 26) died.

conclusionThe TED program may be successful at attracting patients and diverting their care away from busy local EDs, and few patients treated by the TED program visited the ED within the subsequent 7 days. This model of care may provide a solution to offload from overcrowded EDs and improve access to comprehensive care for patients who are unhoused.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective StudiesEmergency departmentIll-housedInner city health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.