Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40120060›Full record

SynthesisForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025

The mastoid triangle (Ma-Ast-Po) as a sexually dimorphic feature - a systematic review of 1604 human skulls and meta-analysis.

Maria Eduarda Ramos Stefanel, Lígia Melissa de Souza, Fernanda Thomaz de Aquino Macedo, Débora Duarte Moreira, Rhonan Ferreira Silva, Nikolaos Angelakopoulos, Walbert Andrade Vieira, Luiz Renato Paranhos, Ademir Franco

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria Eduarda Ramos StefanelDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Office 03, Block E, Swift, São Paulo, Campinas, 13.045-755, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-7296-1475
Lígia Melissa de SouzaDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Office 03, Block E, Swift, São Paulo, Campinas, 13.045-755, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0004-8194-0316
Fernanda Thomaz de Aquino MacedoDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Office 03, Block E, Swift, São Paulo, Campinas, 13.045-755, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-9463-0264
Débora Duarte MoreiraDivision of Oral Radiology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, São Paulo, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2024-9976
Rhonan Ferreira SilvaDepartment of Forensic Odontology, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3680-7020
Nikolaos AngelakopoulosDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8511-4645
Walbert Andrade VieiraDepartment of Dentistry - Endodontics, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8872-2865
Luiz Renato ParanhosDepartment of Community and Social Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7599-0120
Ademir FrancoDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Office 03, Block E, Swift, São Paulo, Campinas, 13.045-755, Brazil. ademir.franco@slmandic.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0002-1417-2781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mastoid triangle is the area between the craniometric landmarks Mastoidale (Ma), Asterion (Ast) and Porion (Po), which has been studied in the field of physical anthropology as an alleged tool for sexual dimorphism. The evidence in the current scientific literature, however, is disputable. This systematic review aimed to find out how safe is the mastoid triangle for sexual dimorphism. A research protocol submitted to PROSPERO (CRD42023488216) was designed based on PRISMA-P. Pubmed, SciELO, LiLACS, LIVIVO, Open Gray and Open Access Theses and Dissertations were searched with structured strategies. The Joanna Briggs Institute manual was followed and the critical appraisal checklist for cross-sectional studies was used. The search found 14 eligible studies out of 2148 initially screened. The combined sample consisted of 1604 human skulls. Eight studies (57,14%) clearly encouraged the use of the mastoid triangle for sexual dimorphism, while three (21,42%) advised against it. All the studies had a low risk of bias (75-100%). The standardized mean difference between male and females was between 1.00 and 1.42 without statistically significant differences between geographic regions (p > 0.05). Expressive heterogeneity and large confidence intervals were detected, showing great variability across studies. A country-specific subgroup meta-analysis revealed lack of statistically significant differences based on geographic regions. This systematic review showed low level of evidence to support the use of the mastoid triangle as a tool for sexual dimorphism.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksMastoidSex Determination by SkeletonFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansMaleForensic anthropologyForensic dentistryMastoidMorphologySexual dimorphism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.