ArticleOral radiology2025
Patient knowledge and misconceptions about imaging exams and X-rays: the need for clearer guidance in dental care.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dental Radiophobia: A Narrative Review of Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Public Health Consequences of Dental Radiography Fear in the Community - With a Focus on Both Patient and Clinician-Level Fear.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess patients' knowledge and possible misconceptions regarding imaging exams and their association to ionizing radiation.
methodsPatients who sought dental care at the Federal University of Santa Maria Dental School (Brazil) were invited to enroll in the study. Patients filled out a questionnaire that covered demographic information, knowledge regarding imaging exams, X-rays, dental radiographs, and information sources (internet or dentist/physician). Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and chi-square test.
resultsTwo hundred thirty-five participants were enrolled (mean age 44 ± 15 years), of whom 60% were female and 68% had at least 8 years of formal education. Most participants (74.5%) reported knowing what X-rays are. When questioned if the following exams used X-rays, the majority said radiographs used X-rays (91.5%), but mistakes were revealed for tomography (51.7%), mammography (59.4%), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (40.2%). Gender, educational level, and reported knowledge about X-rays were not associated with correct answers (P > 0.05). Younger patients answered more accurately that ultrasound (P = 0.009) and MRI (P = 0.025) do not use X-rays, and older patients correctly associated mammography with X-rays (P < 0.001). Patients whose information source was the internet tended to incorrectly state that mammography (P = 0.007) and tomography (P = 0.063) did not use X-rays.
conclusionPatients often fail to differentiate the imaging exams that use X-rays, despite reporting that they understand what X-rays are. Dentists should be aware of the misconceptions patients may encounter when using the internet as a source of information and provide clearer guidance about acquisition and purpose of imaging exams, with emphasis on radiation protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40120056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.