ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
Point of Care Nucleic Acid Testing for Influenza-Like Illness: A Cost-Consequence Analysis for High-Risk Patients in Primary Care in Germany.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SARS-CoV-2 Point-of-Care Testing Modalities: Integrating Molecular, Immunological, Biosensor, and AI Approaches.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging Multimodal Point-of-Care Diagnostic Strategies for Rapid Detection and Management of Respiratory Viruses: A State-of-the-Art Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rapid diagnosis of acute pediatric respiratory infections with Point-of-Care and multiplex molecular testing.Infection · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInfluenza A/B virus, severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cause similar symptoms, often referred to as influenza-like illness, but require different treatments which must be administered within a short timeframe after symptom onset. This necessitates rapid detection and accurate differentiation by primary care providers, ideally at point of care (POC). POC nucleic acid tests such as the multiplex, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Xpert
methodsA 1-year decision tree was developed to compare Xpert Xpress with antigen testing, send-out PCR, and empiric diagnosis, for influenza A/B virus, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV. The model accounted for diagnostic accuracy and projected the share of patients receiving results within guideline-recommended treatment windows. Data on test accuracy, treatment effects, and costs were sourced from literature and German databases. The main outcome was total cost to the SHI for the 2023/24 respiratory illness season.
resultsXpert Xpress was associated with the highest number of net correct treatment courses (n = 443,600) versus empiric diagnosis (n = 239,250), antigen testing (n = 347,218), and send-out PCR (n = 280,527). Acquisition costs were highest for Xpert Xpress (EUR 38.4 million versus EUR 27.4 million for antigen testing and EUR 33.5 million for send-out PCR) but were offset by reduced hospitalization and intensive care costs. Overall, Xpert Xpress was associated with cost savings of EUR 1.97 million versus empiric diagnosis, EUR 10.1 million versus antigen testing, and EUR 20.8 million versus send-out PCR.
conclusionsUsing Xpert Xpress at POC combined fast turnaround with high diagnostic accuracy, thereby increasing correct treatment courses while reducing total costs for influenza, COVID-19, and RSV, offering substantial savings to the German SHI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.