ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Use of the biopsychosocial model of functioning in physiotherapeutic evaluation of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a survey-based study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur study aimed to analyze the use of the biopsychosocial model of functioning in the physiotherapeutic evaluation of patients with obstructive sleep apnea in Brazil.
methodsPhysiotherapists working with sleep-related breathing disorders were included. They completed an electronic questionnaire with items related to physiotherapeutic evaluations and sociodemographic characteristics. Data were reported in descriptive statistics, and the Wilcoxon test compared the codes of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) included in the evaluation and therapeutic objectives.
resultsThe sample (n = 72) had a mean age of 41.4 ± 8.3 years, and most (n = 40) worked in the Southeast region. About 43.1% of the physiotherapists held sleep therapy certifications, 87.5% worked in clinical care, and most (62.5%) only with sleep disorders. Regarding the evaluation of sleep functions, 98.6% of the physiotherapists evaluated excessive sleepiness, and sleep quality was investigated using subjective questioning (80.3%). The components considered very relevant for evaluation were activity (73.6%), followed by body functions (72.2%), environmental factors (70.8%), body structure (65.3%), and participation (63.9%). Some components were evaluated but were not often included among the therapeutic objectives, such as recreational activity (p = 0.016) and intimate relationships (p = 0.035).
conclusionsPhysiotherapists reported collecting information on all functioning components; most were activity and body function components. However, standardized evaluation tools for investigating functioning are not often applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40120025What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.