Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40120014›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025

Empirical pharmacodynamic model of phenylephrine and intrathecal bupivacaine for mean arterial pressure prediction in obstetric patients presenting for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

Sherwin C Davoud, Basak Ozaslan, Eleonora M Aiello, Ricardo Kleinlein, Braden Eberhard, Hassan Hassan, Francis J Doyle, Vesela P Kovacheva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sherwin C Davoud *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, L1, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Basak Ozaslan *Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-1892
Eleonora M Aiello *Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5129-8829
Ricardo KleinleinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, L1, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7313-7601
Braden EberhardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, L1, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-965X
Hassan HassanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, L1, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Francis J DoyleHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3293-9114
Vesela P KovachevaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, L1, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. vkovacheva@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7367-3394

Funding

Brigham and Women's Hospital Ignite grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia may be complicated by hypotension in up to 80% of the patients. The response to standard-of-care prophylactic phenylephrine infusion varies, and there is little guidance on achieving optimal blood pressure control. In this work, we developed a data-driven pharmacodynamic relationship between intravenous phenylephrine, intrathecal bupivacaine, and maternal mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients presenting for cesarean delivery. In this single-center cohort study, secondary use data were available for normotensive patients presenting for cesarean delivery. Intraoperative MAP, intrathecal bupivacaine, and intravenous phenylephrine doses were recorded prospectively every minute. The recorded data were used to identify and confirm a time series (Autoregressive with Exogenous Input (ARX)) model for predicting the MAP using MATLAB 2021a System Identification Toolbox and the Prediction Error Method. An independent model validation was conducted using a second dataset collected after the model fitting stage. Model identification was performed on 172 patients, using 70% for model fitting and 30% for testing. The final ARX model, which takes the past three data points to make predictions, performed 48.9% better than a mean constant model for one-minute ahead MAP predictions with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.6 ± 1.3 mmHg. Similar performance was observed on independent validation using a second dataset (N = 84), yielding an RMSE of 4.2 ± 1.6 mmHg for one-minute ahead MAP predictions. Our ARX model showed good performance at up to a three-minute prediction horizon and could be used for future decision support applications to guide phenylephrine dose titration.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalArterial PressureBupivacaineCesarean SectionPhenylephrineAdultAnesthetics, LocalCohort StudiesElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHypotensionInjections, SpinalMonitoring, IntraoperativePregnancyAnesthetics, LocalBupivacainePhenylephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsCesarean deliveryHypotension predictionPharmacodynamic modelSpinal hypotensionVasopressors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.