ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Reviewing Psychological Practices to Enhance the Psychological Resilience Process for Individuals with Chronic Pain: Clinical Implications and Neurocognitive Findings.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Living with pain-a systematic review on patients' subjective experiences.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- The Correlations between Childhood Trauma, Sense of Coherence, and Social Adjustment: The Moderating Role of Emotional Schemas in At-Risk Adolescents.International journal of school health · 2026Article
- Resilience and Aging Among Black Gay and Bisexual Older Men.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPsychological practices have emerged as promising treatments for coping with chronic pain (CP) as a psychological resilience (PR) enhancer mechanism. These practices contain cognitive, behavioral and emotional modulation of pain. In this regard, classical cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and current trends in CBT, including acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness-based practices may demonstrate significant improvements in pain perception, physical functioning, catastrophic beliefs and fear-avoidance behaviors among patients with CP. However, understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms of these practices includes challenges, such as the need to identify associated brain regions with PR to CP. Our review explored psychological practices to enhance PR as a dynamic neurocognitive process (e.g., changing affect) rather than only being a static trait. RECENT
findingsPsychological practices have promising results in improving positive outcomes for CP sufferers. To illustrate, along with superior PR scores, higher positive affect, adaptive pain beliefs, and physical functioning were reported after these practices. Conversely, lower pain catastrophizing, pain-related fear-avoidance, and self-reported pain ratings were seen as PR factors. Moreover, enhanced PR process may be associated with increased activity of the brain regions, including prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex, whereas diminished activity, reactivity, and functional connectivity in the anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala and insula. This review discusses the neurocognitive modulation of CP through psychological practices and highlights the role of enhancing the PR process for individuals with CP. As the field continues to evolve, understanding the importance of psychological practices to develop PR-related factors is crucial for increasing pain management outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.