ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
A real-world study of ixekizumab use patterns, switching and efficacy in patients with plaque psoriasis.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world use of ixekizumab, switching to other biologics, and associated efficacy. This two-year, single-center, retrospective, real-world study collected patient histories and medication records and assessed overall and difficult-to-treat efficacy. Of 258 patients, 31 patients (12%) extended the dosing interval to a mean of 2.6 ± 1.3 months after a mean of 6.6 ± 3.6 months of treatment, with similar efficacy to patients using the labeled dosing interval. In 98 patients who crossed over from secukinumab to ixekizumab, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100 response at 3 months was 78.8%, 61.2% and 41.2%, respectively. The PASI 75/90/100 response at 3 months in patients who switched from ixekizumab to secukinumab (27 patients) was 62.5%, 41.7%, and 33.3%, respectively, while the PASI 75/90/100 response in patients who switched from ixekizumab to adalimumab (12 patients) was 54.5%, 36.4%, and 0%, respectively. Switching from secukinumab to ixekizumab, from ixekizumab to secukinumab, and from ixekizumab to adalimumab in difficult-to-treat areas such as the scalp, genitals, and nails resulted in good responses. Ixekizumab can extend the dosing interval in patients who respond well. Switching biologic therapy between ixekizumab and secukinumab and adalimumab may be considered, as this switching strategy is also used in difficult-to-treat areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40119943What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.