Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119918›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology2025

Optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: eligibility, best practices, and improving transplant outcomes.

Sarah A Wall, Roni Tamari, Zachariah DeFilipp, Gabriela S Hobbs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah A WallDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, 2121 Kenny Road, James Outpatient Care, Office 7226, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. swall10@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8845-1046
Roni TamariDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-0850
Zachariah DeFilippHematopoietic Cell Transplant and Cell Therapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-8974
Gabriela S HobbsDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-9333

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Incyte Corporation n/aNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF), and current guidelines recommend assessing all patients with MF for eligibility. Several patient- and disease-specific factors impact transplantation outcomes, and timely assessment of potential transplant candidates is key to optimizing post-HCT outcomes. The role of HCT in the treatment of MF continues to evolve, with the adoption of newer and safer approaches, enhanced donor availability, use of reduced-intensity conditioning, improvements in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and treatment, and greater understanding of high-risk clinical and molecular features of the disease. These developments highlight the importance of early and ongoing assessment throughout the MF disease course to optimize eligibility and consideration for HCT. Ruxolitinib is approved for first-line treatment of intermediate- or high-risk MF, and emerging data have clarified the important role of ruxolitinib in not only optimizing clinical status before HCT but also mitigating and treating post-HCT complications in patients with MF, notably acute and chronic GVHD and relapse. Here we review strategies for optimizing clinical outcomes in patients considered for and undergoing HCT for MF treated with ruxolitinib. We discuss strategies for appropriate patient and donor selection, optimization of ruxolitinib therapy in the pre- and peri-HCT periods, choice of conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis, post-HCT management of GVHD, continued monitoring for MF relapse, and the role of post-HCT ruxolitinib maintenance to reduce risks of GVHD and disease relapse.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPrimary MyelofibrosisPyrazolesGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansNitrilesPyrimidinesTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HomologousTreatment OutcomeNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinibJanus kinaseMyelofibrosisMyeloproliferative neoplasmRuxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID40119918
PMCPMC12053210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.