ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
A pilot study of deep learning for automatic contouring of sulcus-to-sulcus diameter in ultrasound biomicroscopy.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo construct a deep learning (DL) algorithm for automatic prediction of sulcus-to-sulcus diameter (STS) and distance between STS plane and anterior crystalline lens surface (STSL) from ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images based on YOLOv8 and verify its accuracy and reliability.
methodsThis study used data from 100 eyes of 100 myopic patients treated with ICL from March 2023 to August 2024. UBM was used for the measurements of the STS and STSL (4 images for each eye). The data set (400 images) was randomly split at the patient level into a train, validation and test sets at the ratio of 8:1:1. The ciliary sulci on both sides and the anterior capsule of the lens in the UBM images were located with the YOLOv8 algorithm, and then the distances were calculated and compared with the manual labeled values and compared against an external expert with ANOVA, the YOLOv8 algorithm was tested in 26 eyes (104 images ) independent UBM data sets. Bland-Altman tests and intergroup correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the agreement between the labeled and YOLOv8 predicted values.
resultsThe deep learning-predicted STS and STSL demonstrated a high level of accuracy and reduced contouring time (by savings of 98.80% of work time) when compared with manual labeling contours in the testing set and showed a good accuracy when compared with external ophthalmologist manual labeling contours and in the external evaluation. The prediction error of the STS being 3.27 ± 2.01% and STSL being 67.95 ± 140.09% for the YOLOv8 algorithm at testing set, 4.10 ± 3.00 (%), and 49.66 ± 42.73 (%) in the external test set. The ICC was 0.312 between the predicted and labeled STS (P = 0.01) and 0.086 between the predicted and labeled STSL (P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe deep learning-predicted STS and STSL demonstrated high accuracy and reduced measurement time, which could have a positive impact on the clinical setting. KEY MESSAGES: What is known: ICL implantation remains challenging because of difficulties in determining the appropriate lens size. There is a wide variation in the values of ciliary sulcus-to-sulcus (STS) diameter measurements. WHAT IS NEW: This is the first study to automatically measure the STS-related distance based on YOLOv8 and assess the accuracy compared to the conventional manual labeling. The YOLOv8 algorithm proposed advantages in high accuracy, automatic prediction of posterior chamber STS-related parameters from ultrasound biomicroscope images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40119915What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.