Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119883›Full record

Observational studySkeletal radiology2025

Association of intra-operative findings with MRI observations in patients with peroneal tendon pathology: a blinded retrospective case-control observational study.

Zachary Elijah Stewart, Samir Ghandour, Ronald W Mercer, William E Palmer, Lorena Bejarano-Pineda

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zachary Elijah StewartMusculoskeletal Imaging & Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. zstewart@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-1270
Samir GhandourMusculoskeletal Imaging & Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Ronald W MercerMusculoskeletal Imaging & Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
William E PalmerMusculoskeletal Imaging & Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Lorena Bejarano-PinedaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssess the accuracy of MRI for peroneal tendon tears, evaluate inter/intra-rater reliability among musculoskeletal radiologists, and identify MRI findings that may be associated with tendon tears. MATERIALS AND

methodsPreoperative MRIs of patients who underwent surgical debridement of peroneal tendon tears were paired with MRIs of a matched control group with medial ankle pain. Randomized MRIs were reviewed by three musculoskeletal radiologists, recording the presence of structural abnormalities of the peroneal tendons and associated morphological abnormalities. Consensus MRI findings were analyzed for associations with surgical diagnoses. Weighted Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa coefficients were used to describe inter/intra-rater agreement.

resultsFor peroneus brevis tear, individual sensitivities ranged from 58 to 87%, specificities ranged from 78 to 97%, and accuracies ranged from 79 to 87%, while consensus showed 84% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 88% accuracy. For peroneus longus tear, individual sensitivities ranged from 14 to 57%, specificities ranged from 76 to 94%, and accuracies ranged from 72 to 79%, while consensus showed 36% sensitivity, 91% specificity, and 79% accuracy. Associations were detected between peroneal tendon tears and numerous secondary MR findings. Tearing of the superior peroneal retinaculum was most diagnostically powerful, present in 55.9% of cases and in none of the controls.

conclusionMRI is a valuable tool for assessing for peroneus brevis tears but may be less sensitive for detecting peroneus longus tears. Diagnostic accuracy is similar between radiologists, but there is variability in sensitivity/specificity. No individual radiologist achieved a higher accuracy than that obtained through consensus. This may imply value in additional opinions from multiple radiologists when there is diagnostic uncertainty.

Indexed as

Ankle InjuriesMagnetic Resonance ImagingTendon InjuriesAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityMagnetic resonance imagingPeroneus brevisPeroneus longusSuperior peroneal retinaculumTendinosisTendon tearTenosynovial effusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.