Observational studySkeletal radiology2025
Association of intra-operative findings with MRI observations in patients with peroneal tendon pathology: a blinded retrospective case-control observational study.
Observational study in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Congenital Anomaly of the Peroneus Brevis Tendon With a Bifid Digastric Variant Lacking Insertion on the Fifth Metatarsal Base: A Case Report.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Comment on: Editorial: Peroneal tendon shapes-the case-control design conundrum.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Double-Convex Peroneal Tubercle Morphology and MRI-Detected Peroneal Tendon Abnormality in a Non-Lateral Referral Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association between flat variants of the peroneus brevis tendon and split tears on magnetic resonance imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Validation of an MRI-based classification of peroneus brevis tendon morphology: a four-type system with high inter-rater reliability.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAssess the accuracy of MRI for peroneal tendon tears, evaluate inter/intra-rater reliability among musculoskeletal radiologists, and identify MRI findings that may be associated with tendon tears. MATERIALS AND
methodsPreoperative MRIs of patients who underwent surgical debridement of peroneal tendon tears were paired with MRIs of a matched control group with medial ankle pain. Randomized MRIs were reviewed by three musculoskeletal radiologists, recording the presence of structural abnormalities of the peroneal tendons and associated morphological abnormalities. Consensus MRI findings were analyzed for associations with surgical diagnoses. Weighted Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa coefficients were used to describe inter/intra-rater agreement.
resultsFor peroneus brevis tear, individual sensitivities ranged from 58 to 87%, specificities ranged from 78 to 97%, and accuracies ranged from 79 to 87%, while consensus showed 84% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 88% accuracy. For peroneus longus tear, individual sensitivities ranged from 14 to 57%, specificities ranged from 76 to 94%, and accuracies ranged from 72 to 79%, while consensus showed 36% sensitivity, 91% specificity, and 79% accuracy. Associations were detected between peroneal tendon tears and numerous secondary MR findings. Tearing of the superior peroneal retinaculum was most diagnostically powerful, present in 55.9% of cases and in none of the controls.
conclusionMRI is a valuable tool for assessing for peroneus brevis tears but may be less sensitive for detecting peroneus longus tears. Diagnostic accuracy is similar between radiologists, but there is variability in sensitivity/specificity. No individual radiologist achieved a higher accuracy than that obtained through consensus. This may imply value in additional opinions from multiple radiologists when there is diagnostic uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40119883What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.