Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119878›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2025

Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cenobamate in drug-resistant epilepsy: A retrospective analysis of the patients included into the Early Access Programs (EAP) in Germany, France, and United Kingdom.

Sylvain Rheims, Bernhard J Steinhoff, Edouard Hirsch, Felix Rosenow, Arnaud Biraben, Rhys Thomas, Alessandro Lovera, Paola Lipone, Alessandro Comandini, Caroline Benoist and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cenobamate: An Appraisal Five Years On.Neurology and therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cenobamate reduces epileptiform activity in theFrontiers in neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sylvain RheimsDepartment of Functional Neurology and Epileptology, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4663-8515
Bernhard J SteinhoffDepartment for Adults, Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-5862
Edouard HirschFrancis Rohmer Neurology Epilepsy Units, National Institute of Health and Medical Research 1258, Federation of Translational Medicine of Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0833-8850
Felix RosenowEpilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Arnaud BirabenEpilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Rhys ThomasDepartment of Neurology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2062-8623
Alessandro LoveraGlobal Medical Department, Angelini Pharma S.p.A, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5802-6226
Paola LiponeGlobal Medical Department, Angelini Pharma S.p.A, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro ComandiniGlobal Medical Department, Angelini Pharma S.p.A, Rome, Italy.
Caroline BenoistGlobal Medical Department, Angelini Pharma S.p.A, Rome, Italy.
Elena Alvarez BaronGlobal Medical Department, Angelini Pharma S.p.A, Rome, Italy.
John Paul LeachGlobal Medical Department, Angelini Pharma S.p.A, Rome, Italy.
Karthinathan ThangaveluStatistics Department, Medastats, LLC, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Agnese CattaneoGlobal Medical Department, Angelini Pharma S.p.A, Rome, Italy.

Funding

Angelini Pharma
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInvestigate real-world outcomes in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) patients treated with cenobamate as adjunctive treatment to other antiseizure medications (ASMs) within the Early Access Programs (EAP) in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom.

methodsDRE adults with uncontrolled focal-onset seizures were included from 19 hospitals participating in the EAP in this retrospective study. Data were sourced from clinical records. Participants were evaluated at baseline, 1 months, and 3 months from cenobamate start, and 3, 6, and 12 months after maintenance. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the 50% responder rate, defined as the reduction in seizure frequency ≥50%.

resultsData were collected from 298 patients who received at least one dose of cenobamate; efficacy was evaluated on 216 patients with seizure data available. At baseline, the median epilepsy duration was 22.2 years, and 41.9% of patients had previous epilepsy surgery, including vagus nerve stimulation, with a median of nine previously failed ASMs. The median number of seizures/month was 8.8. After 3 months of maintenance, the 50% responder rate (primary endpoint) was 49.3%; the median percentage seizure reduction from baseline was 49.1%. A total of 100%, ≥90%, and ≥75% seizures reduction were reported in 13.6%, 20.0%, and 33.6% of patients, respectively. Both the responder rate and the median percentage seizure reduction steadily increased during the observation period. At 6-month maintenance, the seizure-free rate was 24.2%. The retention rate assessed by Kaplan-Meier decreased from 96.6% at 1-month cenobamate start to 69.7% at 12-month maintenance. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) to cenobamate occurred in 30.9% of patients, with asthenia, dizziness, and somnolence being the most frequent; the majority were mild-to-moderate and resolved during the observation period; three patients (1.0%) experienced a total of seven serious ADRs, all during titration. SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, cenobamate demonstrated to be an effective option for people with uncontrolled epilepsy even after multiple failed ASMs or failure of epilepsy surgery. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study involved patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, who had continued seizures despite using at least two antiseizure medications (ASMs). Patients received cenobamate (Ontozry) as epilepsy treatment during the Early Access Program (EAP) in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. An EAP allows patients to receive promising new drugs under clinical supervision before they are commercially available. After 6 months from cenobamate start, 49.3% of patients had their seizures cut by half or more, and 13.6% became seizure-free. A total of 30.9% of patients had an undesirable reaction to cenobamate, mostly mild-to-moderate and resolved; the most frequent were asthenia, dizziness, and somnolence.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsCarbamatesChlorophenolsDrug Resistant EpilepsyAdultAgedFemaleFranceGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTetrazolesTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomAnticonvulsantsCarbamatesCenobamateChlorophenolsTetrazolesantiseizure medicationcenobamateresponder rateseizure freedom

Identifiers

PMID40119878
PMCPMC12163514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.