Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119830›Full record

ArticleCriminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH2025

Childhood Risk Factors for Violent Ideations in Late Adolescence and Early Adulthood.

Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud, Laura Bechtiger, Aja Murray, Andrea Tam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manuel EisnerInstitute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5436-9282
Denis RibeaudJacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1668-8319
Laura BechtigerJacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7049-2165
Aja MurrayDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9068-3188
Andrea TamInstitute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Canton of Zurich's Department of EducationJacobs Center for Productive Youth DevelopmentJacobs Foundation 2010-888Jacobs Foundation 2013-1081-1Julius Baer FoundationSwiss Federal Commission on Migration 03-901 (IMES)Swiss Federal Commission on Migration E-05-1076Swiss Federal Office of Public Health 2.001391Swiss Federal Office of Public Health 8.000665Swiss National Science Foundation 100013_116829Swiss National Science Foundation 100014_132124Swiss National Science Foundation 100014_149979Swiss National Science Foundation 10FI14_170409/1Swiss National Science Foundation 10FI14_170409/2Swiss National Science Foundation 10FI14_198052/1Swiss National Science Foundation 405240-69025Visana Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViolent ideations (VIs) refer to thoughts, daydreams or fantasies of killing, inflicting serious physical harm or humiliating another person. Violent ideations are of particular interest at the intersection between mental health and violent behaviour. However, little is currently known about developmental trajectories of violent ideations in adolescence and early adulthood, and the extent to which childhood risk factors predict the likelihood of violent ideations.

aimsThis study aims to address three key questions: (1) what are the developmental trends in violent thinking from ages 13 to 24, and how do they differ by sex? (2) To what extent can childhood risk factors predict VIs in late adolescence and early adulthood? (3) Are these associations sex-specific?

methodsData were collected from the z-proso cohort study that is an on-going population-based longitudinal cohort study of 1555 participants. We use participant, teacher and parent reports to examine the extent to which childhood trait aggressiveness, poor impulse control, social rejection, an adverse family environment and violent media consumption predict the likelihood of violent ideations.

resultsDescriptive analyses show that VIs strongly decline from late adolescence to early adulthood. We also find substantial between-individual stability in VIs between ages 17, 20 and 24. Indicators of childhood aggressiveness, poor impulse control, social rejection, an adverse family environment and adult media consumption were found to consistently predict increased violent ideations among males. Among females, self-reported aggressive behaviour, aversive parenting and a poor teacher-child bond had relatively strong associations with VIs. Overall, childhood risk factors were more predictive of VIs among male study participants than among females.

conclusionsThe propensity to experience VIs declines between ages 15 and 24. The experience of VIs during late adolescence to early adulthood had long-term associations with childhood risk factors indicative of general aggressiveness, low impulse control, social rejection, an adverse family context and violent media consumption. Most prospective associations were stronger for males than for females. This is consistent with the notion that a relatively stable violent potential is shaped in childhood for a larger proportion of males than females.

Indexed as

AggressionViolenceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk FactorsSex FactorsYoung Adultdevelopmental criminologymental healthsex differencestrait aggressivenessViolent Ideations

Identifiers

PMID40119830
PMCPMC11974242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.