ReviewJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2025
Rosacea in childhood and adolescence: A review.
Review in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Latest Advances in Rosacea Treatment: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [Ocular rosacea : Clinical aspects, diagnostics, management and treatment].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- [Ocular rosacea : Clinical aspects, diagnostics, management and treatment].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Rosacea in childhood and adolescence: A review.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite presenting with similar symptoms, triggers, and progression patterns as adults, rosacea in children and adolescents is frequently overlooked as a primary differential diagnosis. However, initial manifestations of classic clinical types can be observed from infancy onwards. The frequent association of childhood rosacea with ophthalmologic manifestations is of particular importance in addition to the knowledge of special subtypes such as idiopathic aseptic facial granuloma. Therapeutic options of pediatric rosacea partly overlap with those of common differential diagnoses such as acne vulgaris or perioral dermatitis. However, both the disease itself and its manifestation in this age group entail challenges in the selection of active ingredients and the development of therapeutic concepts. In addition, advice on triggering and aggravation factors is required in order to provide optimal long-term support for those affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.