Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119725›Full record

SynthesisMedical education2025

Transnational medical education programmes and preparation for different country medical practice: A systematic review.

Gareth Edwards, Muirne Spooner, Richard Arnett, Helen Kelly, Jezzdin Carr Alif Carr, Jan Illing

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gareth EdwardsHealth Professions Education Centre (HPEC), RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2055-2852
Muirne SpoonerDepartment of Medicine, RCSI Education & Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9760-0544
Richard ArnettQuality Enhancement Office, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4517-9588
Helen KellyHealth Professions Education Centre (HPEC), RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0009-2374-1913
Jezzdin Carr Alif CarrRCSI & UCD Malaysia Campus (RUMC), George Town, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0004-1671-1277
Jan IllingHealth Professions Education Centre (HPEC), RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-9775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical education is becoming more internationalised. Increasing numbers of students engage in Transnational Medical Education Programmes, pursuing their Primary Medical Qualification outside of their home country; with plans to transition back to their home country - or a third country - after graduation. Medical education is however, inextricably embedded within medical contexts, and a potential mismatch exists between graduates' place of training and place of practice in terms of the knowledge, skills and values required to practice safely in a different context.

aimWhat types of Transnational Medical Education programmes can be identified from the international literature? What are the strengths and weaknesses of these programmes and do they prepare students for international practice?

methodsThis review was based on the PRISMA-Guidelines for systematic reviews. We searched five electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, WEB of Science and ERIC. No date or language restrictions were placed on the inclusion criteria. Data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers. Quality appraisal was carried out using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and a narrative synthesis of the included papers was conducted.

resultsOur literature search identified 12 studies. From the included studies we were able to identify three types of Transnational Medical Education Programme, and a number of strengths and weaknesses of these programmes. Strengths were: increasing medical workforce capacity, enhancing the quality of education locally, promoting intercultural competence and increasing exposure to new ways of working (enhanced communication skills, shared decision-making, experience of multidisciplinary teamwork and patient-centeredness). Weaknesses were: potential curriculum misalignment within the context of clinical practice, language barriers and encountering differences in hierarchical systems, shared decision making and patient-centredness all of which impact preparation for practice.

conclusionTransnational medical education programmes address shortages within the medical workforce by creating additional training opportunities. They can also drive up the quality of medical education locally. There is, however, a potential mismatch between the curriculum and the place of practice which can impact upon graduates' preparation for professional practice.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalInternationalityClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumans

Identifiers

PMID40119725
PMCPMC12355643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.