Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119704›Full record

ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2025

Does telehealth delivery of an occupational therapy home visiting service provide a non-inferior alternative to in-person delivery of the same service? A matched cohort study.

Rachel Lommerzheim, Feby Savira, Georgina Lewis, Grace Taylor, Kiran Hari, Shanice Pereira, Toni Heinemann, Lisa Barry, Rebecca Grant, Dave Parsons and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rachel LommerzheimOccupational Therapy Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-6170-6023
Feby SaviraDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Georgina LewisCurtin School of Allied Health, Occupational Therapy, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Grace TaylorCurtin School of Allied Health, Occupational Therapy, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Kiran HariCurtin School of Allied Health, Occupational Therapy, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Shanice PereiraCurtin School of Allied Health, Occupational Therapy, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Toni HeinemannOccupational Therapy Department, Osborne Park Hospital, Osborne Place, Stirling, Western Australia, Australia.
Lisa BarryOccupational Therapy Department, Osborne Park Hospital, Osborne Place, Stirling, Western Australia, Australia.
Rebecca GrantOccupational Therapy Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Dave ParsonsCurtin School of Allied Health, Occupational Therapy, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Suzanne RobinsonDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Kristie HarperOccupational Therapy Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

Charlies Foundation for Research MRGP22-29_10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth services are encouraging the adoption of telehealth to improve efficiencies and health-care access for patients. Research is needed to explore clinical outcomes in telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services. The aim of this study was to determine if telehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduces total therapy time while maintaining clinical outcomes.

methodsA retrospective matched cohort study to examine the impact of telehealth occupational therapy home visiting services on therapy time and clinical outcomes, compared to standard in-person therapy.

resultsA total of 544 patients were included (telehealth services [case] = 216, in-person services [control] = 272, received both resulting in a hybrid service = 56). Differences in total therapy time between groups were significant: median therapy time in the telehealth (case) group was 40 minutes (IQR: 63.8) versus 160 minutes (IQR: 90) in the in-person (control) group (P < 0.001). Patients in the hybrid group were excluded from this comparison as received mixed care. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of adverse events such as falls, delirium, and pressure injuries (P = 0.32). Fifty-six patients (20.6%) in the case group escalated to require in-person services receiving hybrid care. Factors associated with switching from telehealth to in-person services included the need for carer education and equipment assessment and provision, which resulted in greater therapy time and more occasions of service.

conclusionTelehealth delivery of occupational therapy home visiting services reduced therapy time and did not increase incidences of adverse events. However, telehealth delivery of services is not appropriate for all patients, and hybrid models of care must be considered. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Occupational therapists help patients leave the hospital and live safely at home. They visit homes to see if patients can manage on their own. Therapists may suggest changes like adding grab bars or bathing aids to make the home safer. These visits take a lot of time, so telehealth is being tested as a way to reduce the need for in-person services. This study looked at whether telehealth could save time and reduce workloads. This study found telehealth visits were shorter than in-person visits. It also found there were no differences between groups for events like falls, delirium, and pressure injuries. However, some patients still needed in-person visits, especially for equipment setup or caregiver training. Telehealth is a helpful tool, but it is important to know when in-person visits are still needed.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesHouse CallsOccupational TherapyTelemedicineAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime Factorsdischarge planningefficiencyhome visitingoccupational therapytelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40119704
PMCPMC11929128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.