ArticleJournal of health psychology2025
The Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS): Psychometric properties and results of the Dutch version in a community sample and a sample of women with eating disorders.
Article in Journal of health psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reasons for exercise inventory: A validation of the Dutch version in a community sample and a sample of women with an eating disorder.Journal of health psychology · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the Lithuanian version of the functionality appreciation scale.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body satisfaction in eating disorders (EDs) is negatively affected by critical evaluation of aesthetic aspects. A focus on the appreciation for the functioning of the body could create a more positive perspective. The Functional Appreciation Scale (FAS) measures functional appreciation. This is the first study that examines the Dutch version of the FAS in a clinical sample. Psychometric properties and differences in scores are evaluated in an ED and a community sample consisting of women. Factor analysis identified and confirmed a one-dimensional factor structure. Reliability was adequate; convergent and discriminant validity were supported through correlations with the Body Cathexis Scale and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire respectively. Women with EDs scored significantly lower than women from a community sample. Further research regarding the applicability of the FAS for clinical practice is needed because of the ceiling effect and the lack of strong invariance between the clinical and non-clinical group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.