Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119600›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

The association between additional radiotherapy after systemic chemotherapy and the prognosis of stage FIGO 2018 IVB cervical cancer.

Ai Miyoshi, Fumiaki Isohashi, Makoto Fujii, Tadashi Iwamiya, Masahiko Takemura, Yoshikazu Nagase, Takeshi Yokoi, Emi Yoshioka, Kimihiko Ito, Eri Yamabe and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The association between additional radiotherapy after systemic chemotherapy and the prognosis of stage FIGO 2018 IVB cervical cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ai MiyoshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-2513
Fumiaki IsohashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Makoto FujiiDepartment of Health Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tadashi IwamiyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiko TakemuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshikazu NagaseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaizuka City Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi YokoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaizuka City Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Emi YoshiokaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Kimihiko ItoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Eri YamabeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Kanji MasuharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoko TsujieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toyonaka City Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tadashi KimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Michiko KodamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSystemic platinum-based chemotherapy is the first-line treatment of choice for metastatic cervical cancer. While subsequent radiotherapy after primary chemotherapy is a potential option, its benefit remains unclear. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether post-chemotherapy radiotherapy improves the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 46 eligible patients, including 22 patients receiving chemotherapy-alone and 24 patients receiving chemotherapy followed by subsequent radiotherapy. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, subsequent treatment modality, adverse events during the treatment course, metastasis site, recurrence or progression, and recurrence sites. Fisher exact test or chi-squared test, the Mann-Whitney U test, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model were used.

resultsThe 2-year overall survival (OS) rate for all patients was 47%, with the median OS of 24.8 months. Patients receiving chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy-alone group) had a 2-year OS rate of 23%, while those receiving subsequent radiotherapy (chemotherapy-radiotherapy group) had a significantly higher OS rate of 67% (HR = 2.83, P = 0.006). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 9% and 33%, respectively (HR = 3.25, P = 0.010). Serious adverse events occurred in 46.2% of the chemotherapy-alone group and 29.2% of the chemotherapy-radiotherapy group during subsequent treatment (P = 0.249).

conclusionPost-chemotherapy radiotherapy may improve the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer without increasing serious adverse events. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rateadvanced cancercervical cancerchemotherapymetastasisprognosisradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40119600
PMCPMC12255909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.