Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119590›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

The impact of acquired communication impairments on sexuality and intimacy: A scoping review.

Laura Lin Wolford, Vanessa Arratia, Nicholas Behn, Emma Power

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura Lin WolfordCommunication Sciences and Disorders Department, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2823-0989
Vanessa ArratiaRoyal Rehab LifeWorks Ryde, Sexuality Service, Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas BehnCentre for Language and Communication Science Research, City St Georges, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-9957
Emma PowerUniversity of Technology Sydney, Discipline of Speech Pathology, Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2638-0406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication is critical to sexuality and sexual health. It is therefore reasonable to assume that acquired communication impairments would impact sexuality, but research is sparse. The research that does discuss these impacts can be difficult to find, as studies are spread across a wide variety of literature bases, and sexual topics are often combined with other concerns. Coupled with clinicians' discomfort in addressing sexual issues, this leads to a lack of clinical support for patients' sexual concerns.

aimsThis scoping review aimed to map and summarize the existing literature on sexuality and acquired communication impairments. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Six databases were searched: CINAHL, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus. To find studies from the literature on acquired communication impairments and their aetiologies that addressed sexuality and communication, a combination of sexuality and communication impairment terms was used. A total of 97 articles met inclusion criteria. MAIN CONTRIBUTION: Across aetiologies and literature bases, acquired communication impairments have been found to negatively affect sexuality. However, researchers rarely evaluate the nature of the communication impairment or its effects on sexuality directly. People with communication impairments are more often systematically excluded from acquired disability research on sexuality. Using the reviewed literature, we present recommendations for including sexuality-related topics in communication disorder research and including people with communication impairments in sexuality-related research. We also present recommendations for speech-language pathologists to begin incorporating sexuality-related topics in their clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The effects of communication impairments on sexuality are insufficiently researched. The literature that does exist points to substantial impacts. This area of research deserves more concerted attention so that clinicians may have guidance and support in addressing the issue with their clients. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Though researchers have long posited reasons why acquired communication impairments would logically affect sexuality and intimacy, the literature on the topic has been difficult to find. Such research is spread across disorder areas. Sexuality effects are often hidden amid multiple quality-of-life indicators, or communication impairment impacts are described as one of many independent variables. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This scoping review is the first of its kind to provide an overview of the research into communication impairments' effects on sexuality. It describes the effects that communication impairments can have on sexuality. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This scoping review will help clinicians to find relevant research for their clients' needs and help researchers conduct more thorough research in this area. It also provides clinical recommendations for helping clients with communication impairments access this important part of life.

Indexed as

Communication DisordersSexual BehaviorSexualityFemaleHumansMaleaphasiabrain injurycommunication disorderssexual healthsexualitystroke

Identifiers

PMID40119590
PMCPMC11928778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.