Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119448›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2025

Long-read sequencing identifies copy-specific markers of SMN gene conversion in spinal muscular atrophy.

M M Zwartkruis, M G Elferink, D Gommers, I Signoria, L Blasco-Pérez, M Costa-Roger, J van der Sel, I J Renkens, J W Green, J V Kortooms and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gene-Pseudogene Inversions as a Hidden Source of Missing Heritability.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

M M ZwartkruisDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
M G ElferinkDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
D GommersDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
I SignoriaDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
L Blasco-PérezMedicine Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
M Costa-RogerMedicine Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
J van der SelDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
I J RenkensDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J W GreenDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J V KortoomsDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
C VermeulenCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
R StraverCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
H W M van DeutekomDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J H VeldinkDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
F AsselmanDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
E F TizzanoMedicine Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
R I WadmanDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
W L van der PolDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
G W van Haaften *Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. g.vanhaaften@umcutrecht.nl.
E J N Groen *Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. e.j.n.groen-3@umcutrecht.nl.

Funding

The WashU-UCSC-EBI Human Genome Reference Center."U41HG010972 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ira M Hall, Heng Li · 2019 to 2026
$24.9M
ELSI Administrative Supplement - Center for Human Reference Genome DiversityU01HG010971 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI EICHLER, EVAN, JARVIS, ERICH D · 2019 to 2023
$18.4M
The construction and utility of reference pan-genome graphsU01HG010961 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI LI, HENG, PATEN, BENEDICT · 2020 to 2023
$3.2M
K-mer indexing for pan-genome reference annotationU01HG010963 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JI, HANLEE P, WEISSMAN, TSACHY · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
Representing structural haplotypes and complex genetic variation in pan-genome graphsU01HG010973 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHAISSON, MARK, EICHLER, EVAN · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG010961NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG010963NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG010971NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG010973NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG010972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe complex 2 Mb survival motor neuron (SMN) locus on chromosome 5q13, including the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)-causing gene SMN1 and modifier SMN2, remains incompletely resolved due to numerous segmental duplications. Variation in SMN2 copy number, presumably influenced by SMN1 to SMN2 gene conversion, affects disease severity, though SMN2 copy number alone has insufficient prognostic value due to limited genotype-phenotype correlations. With advancements in newborn screening and SMN-targeted therapies, identifying genetic markers to predict disease progression and treatment response is crucial. Progress has thus far been limited by methodological constraints.

methodsTo address this, we developed HapSMA, a method to perform polyploid phasing of the SMN locus to enable copy-specific analysis of SMN and its surrounding genes. We used HapSMA on publicly available Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing data of 29 healthy controls and performed long-read, targeted ONT sequencing of the SMN locus of 31 patients with SMA.

resultsIn healthy controls, we identified single nucleotide variants (SNVs) specific to SMN1 and SMN2 haplotypes that could serve as gene conversion markers. Broad phasing including the NAIP gene allowed for a more complete view of SMN locus variation. Genetic variation in SMN2 haplotypes was larger in SMA patients. Forty-two percent of SMN2 haplotypes of SMA patients showed varying SMN1 to SMN2 gene conversion breakpoints, serving as direct evidence of gene conversion as a common genetic characteristic in SMA and highlighting the importance of inclusion of SMA patients when investigating the SMN locus.

conclusionsOur findings illustrate that both methodological advances and the analysis of patient samples are required to advance our understanding of complex genetic loci and address critical clinical challenges.

Indexed as

Gene ConversionGene DosageMuscular Atrophy, SpinalSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 ProteinDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenetic MarkersHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic MarkersSMN1 protein, humanSMN2 protein, humanSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 ProteinDark genomic regionsGene conversionLong-read sequencingSegmental duplicationsSpinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID40119448
PMCPMC11927269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.