ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Evaluating the prevalence of eating disorder risk and low energy availability risk in collegiate athletes.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) and Body Composition.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rethinking Energy Availability from Conceptual Models to Applied Practice: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs): Risk Assessment in Collegiate Female Athletes.International journal of exercise science · 2026Article
- Screening for eating disorders and low energy availability in female trail runners: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders and low energy availability independently and negatively impact eating behaviors and attitudes and overall health. Screening provides early identification of athletes suffering from these conditions, yet few studies have evaluated both simultaneously, and none have investigated eating disorder and low energy availability in the context of sex or sport type. This study determined the prevalence of eating disorder and low energy availability risk in collegiate athletes at a large National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division 1 university and the variation of prevalence by sport, sport type, and sex.
methodsThis cross-sectional study of NCAA Division 1 athletes used a self-administered survey to collect demographic data and assessed risk using the Eating Disorder Screen for Athletes, Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire, and Low Energy Availability in Males Questionnaire. Variations in prevalence were assessed using chi-square tests and variations in mean screening tool scores were assessed using t-tests and ANOVA. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsOut of 220 athletes (76 males, 144 females) across 19 sports, 38.18% were at risk for an eating disorder and 47.17% were at risk for low energy availability, while 22.73% were at risk for both conditions. Females had a higher distribution of positive screens for an eating disorder (p = 0.002) and low energy availability (p < 0.001) than males. Aesthetic sport athletes had the highest proportion of eating disorder risk (p = 0.016)-but low energy availability (p = 0.871) did not vary by sport type. Dance team athletes had the highest prevalence of eating disorder risk by sport (p < 0.001), while women's gymnasts had the highest prevalence of low energy availability risk (p < 0.001) by sport.
conclusionsA high percentage of athletes were at risk for an eating disorder and low energy availability. Screening protocols can identify eating disorders and low energy availability earlier, leading to quicker treatment and prevention of severe consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.