ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2025
Diselenide-based nanoparticles enhancing the radioprotection to the small intestine of mice.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Progress on Selenium Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Neuroprotective Effects for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Jishi Shuanghua Granules in preventing radiation-induced esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy: protocol for a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Mitochondria-targeting organoselenium theranostic radioprotectors for simultaneous treatment and imaging of radiation-induced liver injury.Theranostics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread application of ionizing radiation (IR) in medicine, while beneficial, also poses potential risks that necessitate effective countermeasures. Both 2-(3-aminopropylamino) ethanethiol (WR-1065) and curcumin are recognized as radioprotective agents; however, their clinical utility is hindered by notable shortcomings that could be addressed through reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive amphiphilic nanomaterials. We introduced a newly synthesized poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG)-polycaprolactone (PCL) polymer integrated with diselenide bonds and curcumin (HOOC-SeSe-Cur-PEG-SeSe-Cur-PCL, PEG-Cur-SeSe-PCL). The resulting spherical nanoparticles (NPs), which self-assembled from this polymer, were uniform with an average diameter of 118 nm. As a carrier for WR-1065, these NPs demonstrated a loading capacity of 30.9% and an efficacy of 56.7%. Importantly, the degradation of WR-1065 within the NPs was minimal in gastric fluid, decreasing by only approximately 20% over a 6-hour period. The innovative aspect of these NPs is their design to destabilize in ROS-rich environments, facilitating the release of WR-1065 and curcumin. Indeed, the survival rate of mice increased to 50% when these NPs were orally administered prior to exposure to a lethal dose of whole-body irradiation (8 Gy). The radioprotective impact of WR-1065-loaded NPs was evident in the small intestine of irradiated mice, characterized by the amelioration of radiation-induced epithelial damage, reduction of DNA damage, and inhibition of the apoptotic pathway. Collectively, this oral nanocarrier system for WR-1065 and curcumin holds promise as a potential candidate for the prophylaxis and treatment of acute intestinal injuries induced by IR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.