Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119422›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Survival analysis using machine learning in transplantation: a practical introduction.

Andrea Garcia-Lopez, Maritza Jiménez-Gómez, Andrea Gomez-Montero, Juan Camilo Gonzalez-Sierra, Santiago Cabas, Fernando Giron-Luque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea Garcia-LopezResearch Department, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia. aegarcia@colombianadetrasplantes.com.
Maritza Jiménez-GómezResearch Department, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrea Gomez-MonteroResearch Department, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan Camilo Gonzalez-SierraUniversidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Santiago CabasResearch Department, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Fernando Giron-LuqueResearch Department, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival analysis is a critical tool in transplantation studies. The integration of machine learning techniques, particularly the Random Survival Forest (RSF) model, offers potential enhancements to predictive modeling and decision-making. This study aims to provide an introduction to the application of the RSF model in survival analysis in kidney transplantation alongside a practical guide to develop and evaluate predictive algorithms.

methodsWe employed a RSF model to analyze a simulated dataset of kidney transplant recipients. The data were split into training, validation, and test sets using split sample (70%-30%) and cross-validation (5-folds) techniques to evaluate model performance. Hyperparameter tuning strategies were employed to select the best model. The concordance index (C-index) and Integrated Brier Score (IBS) were used for internal validation. Additionally, time-dependent AUC, F1 score, accuracy, and precision were evaluated to provide a comprehensive assessment of the model's predictive performance. Finally, a Cox Proportional Hazards model was fitted to compare the results of the main metrics between both models. All analyses were supported by step-by-step code to ensure reproducibility.

findingsThe RSF model obtained a C-index of 0.774, an IBS of 0.090. The F1 score was of 0.945, accuracy was 89.67 and precision was 90.99%. The time-dependent ROC analysis produced an AUC of 0.709, indicating a moderate predictive performance. Lastly, the analysis shows that the three most important variables are donor age, BMI, and recipient age.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the robustness and potential of the RSF model in kidney transplant analysis, achieving strong validation metrics and highlighting its advantages in managing complex, censored data, while emphasizing the need for further exploration of hybrid models and clinical integration.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationMachine LearningHumansSurvival AnalysisArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningSurvival AnalysisTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID40119422
PMCPMC11929298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.