Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119420›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025

Physical stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels: design, fabrication strategies, and biomedical applications.

Rumi Acharya, Sayan Deb Dutta, Hemadri Mallik, Tejal V Patil, Keya Ganguly, Aayushi Randhawa, Hojin Kim, Jieun Lee, Hyeonseo Park, Changyeun Mo and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomaterials in organoid research: current state and future directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rumi Acharya *Department of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Sayan Deb Dutta *Department of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Hemadri MallikDepartment of Botany, The University of Burdwan, Bardhaman, West Bengal, 713104, India.
Tejal V PatilDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Keya GangulyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Aayushi RandhawaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Hojin KimDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Jieun LeeDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Hyeonseo ParkDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Changyeun MoDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea. cymoh100@kangwon.ac.kr.
Ki-Taek LimDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea. ktlim@kangwon.ac.kr.

Funding

Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) IITP-2025-RS-2023-00260267National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2018R1A16A1A03025582; NRF2022R1I1A3063302,
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels hold immense potential for tissue engineering due to their inherent biocompatibility, tunable properties, and capacity to replicate the mechanical environment of natural tissue, making physical stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels a promising candidate for tissue engineering. These hydrogels can be tailored to respond to specific physical triggers such as temperature, light, magnetic fields, ultrasound, mechanical force, and electrical stimuli, allowing precise control over their behavior. By mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM), DNA hydrogels provide structural support, biomechanical cues, and cell signaling essential for tissue regeneration. This article explores various physical stimuli and their incorporation into DNA hydrogels, including DNA self-assembly and hybrid DNA hydrogel methods. The aim is to demonstrate how DNA hydrogels, in conjunction with other biomolecules and the ECM environment, generate dynamic scaffolds that respond to physical stimuli to facilitate tissue regeneration. We investigate the most recent developments in cancer therapies, including injectable DNA hydrogel for bone regeneration, personalized scaffolds, and dynamic culture models for drug discovery. The study concludes by delineating the remaining obstacles and potential future orientations in the optimization of DNA hydrogel design for the regeneration and reconstruction of tissue. It also addresses strategies for surmounting current challenges and incorporating more sophisticated technologies, thereby facilitating the clinical translation of these innovative hydrogels.

Indexed as

DNAHydrogelsTissue EngineeringAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsExtracellular MatrixHumansTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsDNAHydrogelsBiomechanical cuesDNA hydrogelExtracellular matrixPhysical stimuliTissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID40119420
PMCPMC11929200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.