ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025
Physical stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels: design, fabrication strategies, and biomedical applications.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration: Niche reprogramming, precision therapeutics, and structural reconstruction.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- 4D nanoimaging-guided smart therapeutics: spatiotemporal control of disease microenvironments.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Trainable Hydrogels: Mechanistic Principles, Training Strategies, and Frontier Applications.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Bioengineering DNA-based hydrogels for regenerative medicine: A review of programmable design, chemical synthesis and therapeutic potential.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Intelligent design and application of molecular recognition hydrogels in tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Calpain-1 Potentiates Periodontal Regeneration via PHLPP1-ERK-Driven Osteogenesis in Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.International dental journal · 2026Article
- A DNA Tetrahedron Delivery Asiatic Acid to Reprogram Mitochondrial Metabolism for Promoting Bone Regeneration via STAT3 Phosphorylation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Biomaterials in organoid research: current state and future directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Stimuli-responsive hydrogels based on cascade reactions: a novel strategy to promote the efficient repair of diabetic wounds.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Hydrogel Network Architecture Design Space: Impact on Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Advancements in Hydrogels: A Comprehensive Review of Natural and Synthetic Innovations for Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels hold immense potential for tissue engineering due to their inherent biocompatibility, tunable properties, and capacity to replicate the mechanical environment of natural tissue, making physical stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels a promising candidate for tissue engineering. These hydrogels can be tailored to respond to specific physical triggers such as temperature, light, magnetic fields, ultrasound, mechanical force, and electrical stimuli, allowing precise control over their behavior. By mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM), DNA hydrogels provide structural support, biomechanical cues, and cell signaling essential for tissue regeneration. This article explores various physical stimuli and their incorporation into DNA hydrogels, including DNA self-assembly and hybrid DNA hydrogel methods. The aim is to demonstrate how DNA hydrogels, in conjunction with other biomolecules and the ECM environment, generate dynamic scaffolds that respond to physical stimuli to facilitate tissue regeneration. We investigate the most recent developments in cancer therapies, including injectable DNA hydrogel for bone regeneration, personalized scaffolds, and dynamic culture models for drug discovery. The study concludes by delineating the remaining obstacles and potential future orientations in the optimization of DNA hydrogel design for the regeneration and reconstruction of tissue. It also addresses strategies for surmounting current challenges and incorporating more sophisticated technologies, thereby facilitating the clinical translation of these innovative hydrogels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.