Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119374›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Evaluation of palatal mucosal thickness in maxillary posterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography combined with intraoral scanning: a cross-sectional study on correlating factors.

Shaoqing Sun, Tongfen Zhang, Wenxi Zhao, Zikai Gong, Linglu Jia, Weiting Gu, Yong Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shaoqing Sun *Department of Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Research Center of ental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, No.44-1 Wenhua Road West, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
Tongfen Zhang *Department of Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Research Center of ental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, No.44-1 Wenhua Road West, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
Wenxi ZhaoDepartment of Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Research Center of ental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, No.44-1 Wenhua Road West, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
Zikai GongDepartment of Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Research Center of ental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, No.44-1 Wenhua Road West, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
Linglu JiaDepartment of Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Research Center of ental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, No.44-1 Wenhua Road West, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
Weiting GuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, No.107 Wenhua Road West, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China. weitinggu@163.com.
Yong WenDepartment of Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Research Center of ental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, No.44-1 Wenhua Road West, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China. wenyong@sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

Clinical Research Center of Shandong University No. 2020SDUCRCC006Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Provincial No. ZR2021MH075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) combined with intraoral scanning (IOS) technology was used to measure and analyze the variation patterns of the palatal masticatory mucosa (PMM) in the maxillary posterior region and its correlation with gender, gingival biotype (GB), and the palatal bone thickness (PBT), thereby establishing a theoretical foundation for autogenous soft tissue augmentation procedures. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 57 Han Chinese patients and 342 affected teeth were included in the study. CBCT and IOS data were obtained for all participants, and 3D models were constructed by segmenting CBCT images based on standardized parameters, followed by alignment with IOS data using reference points. Measurements were conducted at predetermined intervals to evaluate PMM, PBT, and GB. The variability of PMM from the first premolar to the first molar was analyzed bilaterally by gender, age, and GB using t-tests and Games-Howell post-hoc analysis. Pearson's correlation test examined the relationship between PMM and PBT, while linear regression models were utilized to evaluate associations between PMM and clinical factors such as gender, age, and PBT.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference in PMM between the left and right sides of the maxilla (P > 0.05). Overall, PMM increased with greater distance from the gingival margin, and statistically significant differences were observed between specific measurement points at different tooth positions. The second premolar exhibited the greatest thickness at 6 mm, 8 mm, and 10 mm. Gender had a relatively minor impact on PMM. Significant differences in PMM were observed across age groups, with the middle-aged group showing greater PMM compared to the younger group (P < 0.05). At 2 mm from the first molar's gingival margin, significant PMM differences were identified between different GB (P < 0.05). The correlation between PBT and PMM was weak. Regression analysis revealed age as a primary determinant of PMM, with gender and PBT exerting site-specific effects.

conclusionsCBCT combined with IOS proved effective in measuring maxillary PMM. The maxillary posterior region exhibited a symmetrical distribution of PMM, with premolar areas identified as optimal for soft tissue graft harvesting. While no significant correlation was found with gender, GB, or PBT, the mucosa was notably thicker in middle-aged individuals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study presents comprehensive data on PMM thickness across various tooth positions and distances from the gingival margin, facilitating the identification of optimal donor sites for autologous grafts. It highlights regional and ethnic variations in PMM thickness among Han Chinese patients and validates the combined use of CBCT and IOS for accurate, non-invasive measurements.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMaxillaMouth MucosaPalateAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBicuspidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGingivaHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedMolarAutologous graftsCBCTIOSPalatal mucosal thickness

Identifiers

PMID40119374
PMCPMC11929230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.