Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119358›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer using

Xingbiao Liu, Zhilin Ji, Libo Zhang, Linlin Li, Wengui Xu, Qian Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prognostic value ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xingbiao LiuDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Zhilin JiDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Hospital, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Libo ZhangDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Linlin LiDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Wengui XuDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China. wenguixy@yeah.net.
Qian SuDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China. suqian@tjmuch.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82102133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting the response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) facilitates clinical treatment decisions. Our study aimed to establish a machine learning model that accurately predicts the pathological complete response (pCR) using

methodsWe retrospectively included 210 patients with NSCLC who completed neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and subsequently underwent surgery with pathological results, categorising them into a training set of 147 patients and a test set of 63 patients. Radiomic features were extracted from the primary tumour and lymph nodes. Using 10-fold cross-validation with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method, we identified the most impactful radiomic features. The clinical features were screened using univariate and multivariate analyses. Machine learning models were developed using the random forest method, leading to the establishment of one clinical feature model, one primary tumour radiomics model, and two fusion radiomics models. The performance of these models was evaluated based on the area under the curve (AUC).

resultsIn the training set, the three radiomic models showed comparable AUC values, ranging from 0.901 to 0.925. The clinical model underperformed, with an AUC of 0.677. In the test set, the Fusion_LN1LN2 model achieved the highest AUC (0.823), closely followed by the Fusion_Lnall model with an AUC of 0.729. The primary tumour model achieved a moderate AUC of 0.666, whereas the clinical model had the lowest AUC at 0.631. Additionally, the Fusion_LN1LN2 model demonstrated positive net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement values compared with the other models, and we employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations methodology to interpret the results of our optimal model.

conclusionsOur fusion radiomics model, based on

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsLymph NodesPositron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImmunotherapyMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyRadiomicsRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsNeoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapyNon-small cell lung cancerPathological responsePETRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40119358
PMCPMC11929329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.