ArticleBMC cancer2025
Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer using
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiomics-Based AI for Predicting Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Pathological Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- The value of positron emission tomography scan in predicting pathologic response of non-small cell lung cancer managed by neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Radiomics to understand pre-treatment tumor biology for resectable non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical-radiomics nomogram integrating lymph node radiomic features to predict immunotherapy response in advanced biliary tract cancers.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Improving prediction of lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer via dynamic [European radiology · 2025Article
- Delta-Radiomics Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Treated with Cetuximab Plus Avelumab (CAVE Trial).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Personalized Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- MRI-based radiomics for preoperative T-staging of rectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Predicting exploratory thoracotomy in non-small cell lung cancer: a computed tomography based nomogram approach.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting the response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) facilitates clinical treatment decisions. Our study aimed to establish a machine learning model that accurately predicts the pathological complete response (pCR) using
methodsWe retrospectively included 210 patients with NSCLC who completed neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and subsequently underwent surgery with pathological results, categorising them into a training set of 147 patients and a test set of 63 patients. Radiomic features were extracted from the primary tumour and lymph nodes. Using 10-fold cross-validation with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method, we identified the most impactful radiomic features. The clinical features were screened using univariate and multivariate analyses. Machine learning models were developed using the random forest method, leading to the establishment of one clinical feature model, one primary tumour radiomics model, and two fusion radiomics models. The performance of these models was evaluated based on the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsIn the training set, the three radiomic models showed comparable AUC values, ranging from 0.901 to 0.925. The clinical model underperformed, with an AUC of 0.677. In the test set, the Fusion_LN1LN2 model achieved the highest AUC (0.823), closely followed by the Fusion_Lnall model with an AUC of 0.729. The primary tumour model achieved a moderate AUC of 0.666, whereas the clinical model had the lowest AUC at 0.631. Additionally, the Fusion_LN1LN2 model demonstrated positive net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement values compared with the other models, and we employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations methodology to interpret the results of our optimal model.
conclusionsOur fusion radiomics model, based on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.