ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Perceptions and experiences related to use of breastmilk from another mother in central Nepal: a qualitative study.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Facilitators, barriers, and factors determining the willingness to donate human milk among postpartum mothers in a tertiary women's hospital in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.International breastfeeding journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhen maternal breastmilk is unavailable in sufficient quantity for infant needs, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of donor breastmilk if safe, affordable, and available. However, in Nepal and most other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there are significant barriers to accessing safe and affordable donor breastmilk, including a paucity of milk banks. An in-depth understanding of perceptions and experiences in Nepal related to use of donor breastmilk could inform the development of interventions to address identified barriers.
methodsFrom December 2019 to January 2020, we conducted a qualitative study, including focus group discussions (FGDs) with parents and community health workers (CHW), and key informant interviews (KIIs) with public health stakeholders in Dhulikhel municipality, Kavrepalanchowk district in Nepal. In total, 44 individuals participated in five FGDs, including two with mothers, one with fathers, and two with CHW. Nine KIIs were conducted with stakeholders. Thematic analyses of translated transcripts were undertaken to explore perceptions and experiences of participants related to use of human donor breastmilk.
resultsParticipants in this study reported that informal breastmilk sharing between relatives and neighbors is common when a mothers' breastmilk is unavailable or insufficient and such sharing can occur via direct breastfeeding or milk expression. Numerous potential benefits with breastmilk sharing were described, including overcoming initial difficulties with milk supply in the postpartum period, convenience when mothers are unavailable, and reduced risk of infant infection and gastrointestinal distress. Hesitancies to breastmilk sharing included the risk of disease transmission from donor to infant and the possibility of decreased bonding between mother and infant. Some participants stated that animal milk is preferable to breastmilk sharing when mothers own milk is not available.
conclusionParticipants were aware of the potential benefits of donor breastmilk but identified numerous barriers to widespread adoption, including concerns about infectious diseases and mother-infant bonding, and preference for animal milks over another mother's milk. Addressing these concerns may help increase the acceptance and practice of donating and using donor breastmilk among mothers in Nepal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.