ArticleBMC public health2025
Identification of amendable risk factors for childhood stunting at individual, household and community levels in Northern Province, Rwanda - a cross-sectional population-based study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildhood stunting, defined as height-for-age below - 2 standard deviations (SD), disproportionately affects the Northern Province of Rwanda. We investigated risk factors contributing to stunting in this region at individual, household, and societal/community levels to inform future interventions.
methodsWe conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study using a quantitative questionnaire in households with children aged 1-36 months in the Northern Province. Anthropometric measurements of children and mothers were taken to estimate nutritional status. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify independent risk factors of stunting, reporting odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p-values.
resultsOverall, stunting prevalence was 27.1% in children aged 1-36 months. At the individual level, boys exhibited 82% higher risk of stunting compared to girls (aOR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.78). Household-level factors such as maternal height and BMI were inversely associated with the risk of childhood stunting (aOR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90, 0.97 and aOR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99, respectively). Other risk factors included no breastfeeding at the time of interview (aOR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.23, 3.25), presence of twins or triplets aged 1-36 months (aOR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.21, 5.57), female-headed (single parent) households (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.00, 4.26), and absence of handwashing facilities near the toilet (aOR: 3.30, 95% CI: 1.36, 7.98). No societal/community factors were significantly associated with childhood stunting in the Northern Province.
conclusionChildhood stunting in the Northern Province of Rwanda is associated with several factors that could lend themselves to interventions, e.g., improved handwashing facilities, improved childcare practices and targeting vulnerable groups such as boys, households with twins or single parents. Additionally, a thorough exploration of identified risk factors through qualitative approaches involving all stakeholders in child and maternal nutrition is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.