Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119345›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Evaluation and examination of factors influencing the continued effective use of E-learning among faculty members of medical sciences universities.

Ali Garavand, Nasim Aslani, Pooria Afsharifard, Hamed Nadri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali GaravandDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Nasim AslaniDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Pooria AfsharifardDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Health Management & Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed NadriDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Health Management & Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Hamednadri4@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionE-learning facilitates the learning process for medical students by allowing them to enhance their knowledge, skills, and professional experiences, thereby improving quality and standards in education. The objective is to investigate the continuity of use of e-learning systems among academic faculty members of medical sciences universities.

methodsA researcher-constructed questionnaire was distributed to collect data from approximately 300 faculty members of medical sciences universities who have used the e-learning system for at least one year. Out of these, 120 questionnaires contained valid responses. The data were processed using statistical software and the statistical analysis technique based on (SEM).

resultsThe results indicated that among the demographic factors of the members, age has a significant impact on the continued use of the electronic learning system. Among the two most influential factors on the continued use of the system, perceived usefulness and satisfaction, perceived usefulness was not influential in our study. This means that the members are aware of the benefits of face-to-face instruction compared to system use because the system is simple and basic without features.

conclusionIn our study, the incentive factor was not influential, partly due to the alignment of objectives between university management and faculty members and the use of the electronic system. Presenting more complex systems incorporating decision support and virtual training could increase perceived usefulness somewhat. Additionally, providing blended systems, combining face-to-face and virtual modalities, could compensate for the perceived usefulness. CLINICAL TRAIL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionEducation, DistanceFaculty, MedicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultAcceptance of eLearning systemeLearning systemElectronic educationFaculty members

Identifiers

PMID40119345
PMCPMC11929210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.