Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119324›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Using machine learning for predicting cancer-specific mortality in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a SEER-based study.

Lei Dai, Kun Ye, Gaosheng Yao, Juan Lin, Zhiping Tan, Jinhuan Wei, Yanchang Hu, Junhang Luo, Yong Fang, Wei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lei Dai *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Kun Ye *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Gaosheng Yao *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Juan Lin *Department of Pediatrics, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Zhiping TanDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jinhuan WeiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yanchang HuSun Yat-sen University School of Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Junhang LuoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yong FangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. fymartin@sina.com.
Wei ChenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. chenw3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

Youth Medical Innovation and Practice Research Program of Guangzhou 2023QNYXZD005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurately assessing the prognosis of bladder cancer patients after radical cystectomy has important clinical and research implications. Current models, based on traditional statistical approaches and complex variables, have limited performance. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-based prognostic model to predict 5-year cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy, and compare its performance with current validated models.

methodsPatients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University for model construction and validation. We used univariate and multivariate Cox regression to select variables with independent prognostic significance for inclusion in the model's construction. Six ML algorithms and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to construct prediction models. Concordance index (C-index) and Brier scores were used to compare the discrimination and calibration of these models. The Shapley additive explanation method was used to explain the best-performing model. Finally, we compared this model with three existing prognostic models in urothelial carcinoma patients using C-index, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier scores, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsThis study included 8,380 patients, with 6,656 in the training set, 1,664 in the internal validation set, and 60 in the external validation set. Eight features were ultimately identified to build models. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model showed the best performance in predicting 5-year CSM in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy (internal validation: C-index = 0.723, Brier score = 0.191; external validation: C-index = 0.791, Brier score = 0.134). The lymph node density and tumor stage have the most significant impact on the prediction. In comparison with current validated models, our model also demonstrated the best discrimination and calibration (internal validation: C-index = 0.718, AUC = 0.779, Brier score = 0.191; external validation: C-index = 0.789, AUC = 0.884, Brier score = 0.137). Finally, calibration curves and DCA exhibited better predictive performance as well.

conclusionsWe successfully developed an explainable ML model for predicting 5-year CSM after radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients, and it demonstrated better performance compared to existing models.

Indexed as

CystectomyMachine LearningUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsROC CurveSEER ProgramBladder cancerMachine learningPrognosis modelRadical cystectomySEER

Identifiers

PMID40119324
PMCPMC11929216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.