ArticleBMC primary care2025
Attitude and practice of family physicians towards physical examination of patients of the opposite gender in primary health care centres in the Kingdom of Bahrain: a qualitative exploratory study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysician attitudes towards patients of opposite genders may determine a lack of comprehensive care during patient encounters in primary care, and this has not been previously documented in the Arab Gulf region. This study investigated the attitudes and practices of family physicians about physical examinations of patients of the opposite gender in the Kingdom of Bahrain, specifically identifying barriers to performing physical examinations on patients of the opposite gender.
methodQualitative exploratory, in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 board-certified Bahraini family physicians at nine primary health care centres from all five regions of the Kingdom of Bahrain. The participants were selected by a purposive sampling designed to include all physicians eligible as per inclusion criteria. A semi-structured interview guide was used for the interviews in English (appendix.1). Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed by thematic analysis.
resultsThe study revealed four distinct and interrelated themes, including: 1) Influencers affect the practice of performing physical examinations on patients of opposite genders; 2) Effective communication and rapport-building with patients of the opposite gender before physical examination; 3) Physicians collaborate in the physical examination of patients of the opposite gender when needed; 4) Importance of a functional chaperone system in the primary health care centres to provide optimal care.
conclusionsFamily physicians identified cultural, religious, and medico-legal barriers to performing physical examinations on opposite-gender patients. They reported adapting to these challenges by finding workarounds, such as referring patients to physicians of the same gender or using a chaperone system. To address these challenges effectively, establishing a regular chaperone system and trainings on examination techniques may enhance physicians' skills and confidence in conducting physical examinations on opposite-gender patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.