ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Feasibility of lung ultrasound for locating bronchial blockers in pediatric thoracic surgery: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the feasibility of using lung ultrasound to determine the position of bronchial blockers in pediatric patients.
methodsIn this study, children aged 4-8 years who underwent elective right one-lung ventilation at our hospital between January 2019 and August 2022 were selected. We collected the results of lung ultrasound and fiberoptic bronchoscopy during the placement of bronchial blockers in these children. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of lung ultrasound in determining the position of bronchial blockers were calculated. Additionally, the reproducibility of lung ultrasound in determining the appropriateness of bronchial blockers was also calculated. Furthermore, information regarding whether there were complications associated with lung ultrasound examination or fiberoptic bronchoscopy was also collected.
resultsThe accuracy of lung ultrasound for determining the position of bronchial blockers was 95.0%. When the position of BBs was appropriate, the sensitivity of lung ultrasound was 96.3% and the specificity was 88.9%. When the position of BBs was too shallow, the sensitivity of lung ultrasound was 75% and the specificity was 96.7%. The reproducibility test of lung ultrasound for determining the position of bronchial blockers had a weighted kappa value of 0.91, P < 0.001. In this study we found 6 children had hypoxemia and 6 children had airway mucosal bleeding during fiberoptic bronchoscopy. And no complications linked to lung ultrasound examination were observed.
conclusionLung ultrasound has high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability in determining the position of bronchial blockers. It is a new and safe method to determine the position of bronchial blockers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.