ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Auto-segmentation of surgical clips for target volume delineation in post-lumpectomy breast cancer radiotherapy.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cerebrovascular CTA radiomics for objective collateral grading in acute ischemic stroke.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop an automatic segmentation model for surgical marks, titanium clips, in target volume delineation of breast cancer radiotherapy after lumpectomy.
methodsA two-stage deep-learning model is used to segment the titanium clips from CT image. The first network, Location Net, is designed to search the region containing all clips from CT. Then the second network, Segmentation Net, is designed to search the locations of clips from the previously detected region. Ablation studies are performed to evaluate the impact of various inputs for both networks. The two-stage deep-learning model is also compared with the other existing deep-learning methods including U-Net, V-Net and UNETR. The segmentation accuracy of these models is evaluated by three metrics: Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and Average Surface Distance (ASD).
resultsThe DSC, HD95 and ASD of the two-stage model are 0.844, 2.008 mm and 0.333 mm, while their values are 0.681, 2.494 mm and 0.785 mm for U-Net, 0.767, 2.331 mm and 0.497 mm for V-Net, 0.714, 2.660 mm and 0.772 mm for UNETR. The proposed 2-stage model achieved the best performance among the four models.
conclusionWith the two-stage searching strategy the accuracy to detect titanium clips can be improved comparing to those existing deep-learning models with one-stage searching strategy. The proposed segmentation model can facilitate the delineation of tumor bed and subsequent target volume for breast cancer radiotherapy after lumpectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.