Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119223›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Exploring the long-term impacts of neonatal hypoglycemia to determine a safe threshold for glucose concentrations.

Meena Garg, Sherin U Devaskar

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meena GargDepartment of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sherin U DevaskarDepartment of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. sdevaskar@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7313-1189

Funding

Electrochemical Liquid Biopsy Assessing Placental HealthR01HD100015 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DEVASKAR, SHERIN U, WEI, FANG · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development HD100015NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoglycemia and impaired metabolic transition are frequently observed in neonates during the first 24-48 h after birth [1, 2]. Severe (< 36 mg/dL or 2 mmol/L) and recurrent (3 or more episodes) hypoglycemia can cause neurological injury and developmental delays. The ambiguity regarding a threshold blood glucose concentration remains due to differing values proposed by various professional organizations. This poses a challenge in diagnosing neonatal hypoglycemia in addition to using a single blood glucose value, which in itself is not entirely reflective of various key molecular processes uncovered by in vitro or pre-clinical studies. The symptoms of hypoglycemia can also be present in conditions other than hypoglycemia, e.g., sepsis and polycythemia, and in many cases, hypoglycemia is clinically unrecognized. Therefore, early screening of at-risk and otherwise healthy-appearing neonates is essential. Continuous glucose monitoring and early interventions such as glucose gel, breast and formula feeding, and intravenous glucose administration are utilized to prevent long-term neurological impairments. However, the safe limits of serum glucose that will prevent neuroglycopenia and neural injury are elusive. The impact of early screening and available therapies on neurodevelopmental outcomes remains uncertain due to the absence of a robust clinical design and combining all causes of neonatal hypoglycemia without making further distinctions from other conditions. This review highlights the controversies in definitions and the most recent information on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes that may impact the early management of NH.Conclusion: Optimizing the definitions and treatment of neonatal dysglycemia is crucial for preventing hypoglycemia-related brain injury. Continuous glucose monitoring technology in neonates offers a promising approach for real-time screening and early intervention.  What is Known: • There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal glucose threshold for intervention and prevention of hypoglycemia-induced brain injury. This suggests brain injury may be incurred over a range rather than a single blood glucose concentration. What is New: • Recent studies suggest that glucose concentrations between 36 mg/dL (2 mmol/L) and 47 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) are acceptable in asymptomatic neonates. However, neurological injury was observed in early school age with glucose values of <36 mg/dl (<2 mmol/L) and in mid-childhood of <30-36 mg/dL (<1.7 -2 mmol/L). This suggests brain injury may be incurred over a range rather than a single blood glucose concentration. • Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) highlights real-time glucose measurement and glycemic lability in neonates. Its use may mitigate long-term neurologic injury by improving early recognition and treatment.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseHypoglycemiaNeonatal ScreeningNeurodevelopmental DisordersHumansInfant, NewbornBlood GlucoseContinuous glucose monitoringGlucoseNeurodevelopmental outcomesNewbornThreshold

Identifiers

PMID40119223
PMCPMC11928350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.