ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2025
Reproducibility of smooth muscle mechanical properties in consecutive stretch and activation protocols.
Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical organ models are crucial for understanding organ function and clinical applications. These models rely on input data regarding smooth muscle properties, typically gathered from experiments involving stimulations at different muscle lengths. However, reproducibility of these experimental results is a major challenge due to rapid changes in active and passive smooth muscle properties during the measurement period. Usually, preconditioning of the tissue is employed to ensure reproducible behavior in subsequent experiments, but this process itself alters the tissue's mechanical properties. To address this issue, three protocols (P1, P2, P3) without preconditioning were developed and compared to preserve the initial mechanical properties of smooth muscle tissue. Each protocol included five repetitive experimental cycles with stimulations at a long muscle length, varying in the number of stimulations at a short muscle length (P1: 0, P2: 1, P3: 2 stimulations). Results showed that P2 and P3 successfully reproduced the initial active force at a long length over five cycles, but failed to maintain the initial passive forces. Conversely, P1 was most effective in maintaining constant passive forces over the cycles. These findings are supported by existing adaptation models. Active force changes are primarily due to the addition or removal of contractile units in the contractile apparatus, while passive force changes mainly result from actin polymerization induced by contractions, leading to cytoskeletal stiffening. This study introduces a new method for obtaining reproducible smooth muscle parameters, offering a foundation for future research to replicate the mechanical properties of smooth muscle tissue without preconditioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.