ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Mesoappendix position variations in laparoscopic appendicectomy; a new anatomical classification to guide surgical strategy.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seeing the Unseen: Illustrated Reflection as a Tool for Risk Awareness in Surgical Training.Cureus · 2026Article
- Complete subserosal embedding of the appendix-cecal complex presenting as a non-visualized appendix during pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dissection of the mesoappendix from the appendix is a crucial step in laparoscopic appendicectomies. Variation in the position of the mesoappendix during this common operation has not been previously described. We propose a classification system for the mesoappendix position seen laparoscopically and evaluate the impact each position has on operative difficulty and surgical approach. The mesoappendix positions in laparoscopic appendicectomies between January 2023 and January 2024 were classified into four categories from M1 to M4. Patients were grouped according to their mesoappendix positions. Outcomes evaluated included operative time, need for additional ports, use of energy devices, deviations from standard operative approach. Various mesoappendix positions were correlated with the intra-operative appendix position and histopathological findings. 104 laparoscopic appendicectomy cases were reviewed. 30 were classified as M1, 31 as M2, 27 as M3, and 16 as M4. Mean operative time was significantly longer for cases where the mesoappendix was in the M3 position (p > 0.001). This position was also more likely to require an additional port and deviate from the standard operative approach including need for retrograde dissection and staple cecectomy. We introduce a potentially surgical important classification system of the mesoappendix in laparoscopic appendicectomies. In this study, we attempt to validate the differences each position has on operative approaches and outcomes. We found that the M3 position is of greater difficulty to approach when dissecting the mesoappendix. This classification may serve as a valuable tool in guiding intra-operative surgical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.