Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119197›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2025

Mesoappendix position variations in laparoscopic appendicectomy; a new anatomical classification to guide surgical strategy.

Ernest Cheng, Raphael Shamavonian, Jasmine Mui, Zachary Bunjo, Amer Matar, Jon Barnard, Amit Sarkar, Wilson Petrushnko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ernest ChengDepartment of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, NSW, 2450, Australia. ernest.cheng1@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9136-5192
Raphael ShamavonianDepartment of Surgery, The Tweed Hospital, Tweed Heads, NSW, Australia.
Jasmine MuiDepartment of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, NSW, 2450, Australia.
Zachary BunjoDepartment of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, NSW, 2450, Australia.
Amer MatarDepartment of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, NSW, 2450, Australia.
Jon BarnardDepartment of Surgery, The Tweed Hospital, Tweed Heads, NSW, Australia.
Amit SarkarDepartment of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, NSW, 2450, Australia.
Wilson PetrushnkoDepartment of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, NSW, 2450, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dissection of the mesoappendix from the appendix is a crucial step in laparoscopic appendicectomies. Variation in the position of the mesoappendix during this common operation has not been previously described. We propose a classification system for the mesoappendix position seen laparoscopically and evaluate the impact each position has on operative difficulty and surgical approach. The mesoappendix positions in laparoscopic appendicectomies between January 2023 and January 2024 were classified into four categories from M1 to M4. Patients were grouped according to their mesoappendix positions. Outcomes evaluated included operative time, need for additional ports, use of energy devices, deviations from standard operative approach. Various mesoappendix positions were correlated with the intra-operative appendix position and histopathological findings. 104 laparoscopic appendicectomy cases were reviewed. 30 were classified as M1, 31 as M2, 27 as M3, and 16 as M4. Mean operative time was significantly longer for cases where the mesoappendix was in the M3 position (p > 0.001). This position was also more likely to require an additional port and deviate from the standard operative approach including need for retrograde dissection and staple cecectomy. We introduce a potentially surgical important classification system of the mesoappendix in laparoscopic appendicectomies. In this study, we attempt to validate the differences each position has on operative approaches and outcomes. We found that the M3 position is of greater difficulty to approach when dissecting the mesoappendix. This classification may serve as a valuable tool in guiding intra-operative surgical decision-making.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisAppendixLaparoscopyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesAcute appendicitisLaparoscopic appendicectomyMesoappendix

Identifiers

PMID40119197
PMCPMC12226687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.