ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Oral health related quality of life in different types of skeletal malocclusion.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) among orthognathic patients with different skeletal malocclusions before initiating orthodontic treatment.
methods150 patients were evaluated for OHRQoL at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department at Boston University Goldman School of Dental Medicine. OHRQoL was measured using: (1) Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) for generic OHRQoL; (2) Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) for condition-specific OHRQoL; and (3) the 12-item oral quality of life instrument (12-item OQOL) for generic OHRQoL. Cephalometric measurements were used to categorize facial types then two-sample t-tests and one-way ANOVAs were employed to analyze OHRQoL across groups.
resultsOHIP-14, OQLQ, and 12-item OQOL baseline scores were statistically different between skeletal Class I, II, and III patients (p < 0.05), with Class II patients showing the highest scores. No significant differences were found between vertical patterns (p > 0.05).
conclusionOHRQoL is different between skeletal Class I, II, and III patients with Class II patients reporting lower quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40119194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.