ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Comparative analysis of RNA expression in a single institution cohort of pediatric cancer patients.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of RNA expression identifies effective targeted drug in myoepithelial carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the low incidence of mutations in pediatric cancers, alternate genomic approaches are needed to identify therapeutic targets. Our study, the Comparative Analysis of RNA Expression to Improve Pediatric and Young Adult Cancer Treatment, was conducted by the UC Santa Cruz Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative and Stanford University School of Medicine. RNA sequencing data from 33 children and young adults with a relapsed, refractory or rare cancer underwent CARE analysis to reveal activated cancer driver pathways and nominate treatments. We compare our pipeline to other gene expression outlier detection approaches and discuss challenges for clinical implementation. Of our 33 patients, 31 (94%) had findings of potential clinical significance. Findings were implemented in 5 patients, 3 of which had defined clinical benefit. We demonstrate that comparator cohort composition determines which outliers are detected. This study highlights the clinical utility and challenges of implementing comparative RNA sequencing analysis in the clinic.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.