ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of early warning signals for soil erosion using remote sensing indices in northeastern Iran.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil erosion represents a major challenge to natural resource conservation, causing land degradation, biodiversity loss, and diminished soil quality. This study explored the use of satellite imagery to evaluate the spatiotemporal risk of soil erosion in northeastern Iran. The ICONA model was applied to identify areas at severe erosion risk, while remote sensing indices (NDVI, NDSI, and TGSI) were employed to analyze erosion trends. NDVI is used to monitor vegetation health, NDSI detects soil salinity levels, and TGSI assesses topsoil grain size distribution, collectively providing critical insights into soil erosion risk in the study area. These indices, derived from the Google Earth Engine with a 30-meter spatial resolution and monthly temporal intervals (2003-2022), were assessed at 100 points, equally divided between eroded and non-eroded regions. Field data, including vegetation plots and soil profiles, were used to validate the remote sensing outputs. Early warning signals were analyzed through three statistical indices-autocorrelation coefficient, skewness, and standard deviation-using Kendall's tau. Results revealed that 39.7% of the area falls under low erosion risk, 58.4% under medium risk, and 1.9% under severe risk. Significant breakpoints in NDSI and NDVI were identified in 2013, while TGSI showed no detectable change. Major shifts occurred near the Alagol, Almagol, and Ajigol wetlands and northern drylands. This study underscores the importance of integrating satellite data with field validation to improve soil management, protect biodiversity, and guide sustainable erosion mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.