ArticleScientific reports2025
A diagnostic model for polycystic ovary syndrome based on machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning and deep learning for diagnosis of Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- A Review of microRNAs in the Post-transcriptional Regulation and its Clinical Manifestation in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Article
- Application of ChatGPT-based artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning and nomogram model for early detection and risk stratification of polycystic ovary syndrome: a multicenter study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Chitosan/Alginate-LoadedReproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome remains a challenge. In this study, we propose constructing a diagnostic model of polycystic ovary syndrome by combining anti-Müllerian hormone with steroid hormones and oestrogens, with the aim of providing more bases and auxiliary means for the diagnosis of this disease. 1. Eighty-four samples from patients who were diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from May 2023 to November 2023 were collected as the case group, and 75 samples from the healthy population of the Health Screening Centre of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University during the same period were collected as the control group. 2. General information (including age, BMI, family history, medication history, etc.) and sex hormone data (including luteinising hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, prolactin, estradiol, testosterone, etc.) were collected from all study subjects. AMH and steroid hormone tests were performed on serum collected from all study subjects. 3. The data of 10 case groups and 10 control groups were randomly selected as validation set data, and the rest of the data were included in the model construction. The acquired data were screened for variables, a classification model based on a machine learning algorithm was constructed, and the constructed model was evaluated and validated for diagnostic efficacy. Ultimately, a total of 8 variables were screened and included in the subsequent model construction, namely LH, LH/FSH, E2, PRL, T, AMH, AD, and COR, with AMH having the highest diagnostic potential among all the variables included in the model. A total of five machine learning models were constructed, the logistic classification model has the best overall performance, and the support vector machine has the weakest overall performance. The validation set has an AUC of 0.86 for the model. In this study, five classification models based on machine learning algorithms were successfully constructed. Combining the evaluation metrics of each model performance, we concluded that the logistic classification model had the best performance capability in our study. However, since this study is a single-center small sample size study, some metabolic features of PCOS may be overlooked, and, as the validation set data in this study come from the same center as the modelling data, the validation results may have several limitations, so it is still necessary to expand the sample size and collect multicenter data to establish an external validation dataset to further improve the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.