ArticleScientific reports2025
Multisensory training enhances anticipation skills in badminton novices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Badminton Players' Expert Advantage in Anticipation Based on Visual and Auditory Cues: Evidence from the Drift Diffusion Model.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Badminton expertise shapes cue extraction and evidence accumulation during perceptual prediction.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In racket sports like badminton, accurately predicting shot timing and spatial positioning allows athletes to better interpret opponents' intentions and respond quickly. Perceptual-cognitive training focused on visual cues can enhance these anticipatory skills. However, anticipation based on both visual and auditory information are generally more accurate than those relying solely on visual cues, suggesting the need to explore the benefits of integrated audio-visual Perceptual-cognitive training. This study investigated the effects of different perceptual-cognitive training protocols on anticipation performance in badminton novices. Participants were divided into four groups: a visual training group (receiving only visual cues during training), an audio-visual training group (receiving both visual and auditory cues), a audio-visual blurred training group (receiving degraded visual and auditory cues), and a control group (watching match videos without specific training) to underwent six training sessions over two weeks. Anticipation performance was assessed using a computer-based task, a high-cognitive-load task (requiring simultaneous digit discrimination), a simulated motor task (involving physical movement to respond), and a real-competition video task. Results showed: (1) Training groups improved in anticipation accuracy, with no such improvement in the control group; (2) Under high cognitive load and simulated motor tasks, the visual training group improved the most, followed by the visual-auditory group, and then the blurred training group. The visual training group also performed better in visual-auditory conditions compared to visual conditions; (3) Improvements were sustained for two weeks. This accuracy improvement is likely because the training protocols, particularly visual training, facilitated action representation by integrating visual and auditory cues based on Event Coding Theory, and guided discovery feedback optimized participants' information search towards critical anticipatory cues. The study concludes that presenting visual cues during the anticipation phase, combined with guided discovery using audio-visual feedback during the feedback phase, optimize skill acquisition and retention. This approach may have broader applications in other sports or training environments where rapid decision-making and predictive accuracy are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.