ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2025
Methodology for the international working group clinical practice guidelines on X-linked hypophosphatemia in children and adults.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- X-Linked Hypophosphatemia Management in Children: An International Working Group Clinical Practice Guideline.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Guideline
- Current Practices in Monitoring Children and Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia: A Global Survey of Expert Experience.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The guideline panel, comprising international experts in X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH), patient partners from the XLH patient population, and guideline methodologists, held 18 teleconferences between January 2023 and July 2024 to develop comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis and management of XLH in children and adults. For a subset of our questions, we utilized the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, assessed the certainty of evidence and formulated GRADEd recommendations. For these questions, the panelists and methodologists collaboratively framed PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes) questions and conducted four systematic reviews assessing the impact of medical therapy-using either burosumab or phosphate and active vitamin D-on patient-important outcomes in the XLH population as well as the impact of medical intervention compared to no treatment. We assessed the risk of bias and transparently generated summary of findings tables using MAGICApp. The panel developed three GRADEd treatment recommendations for adults and two for children. Each GRADEd recommendation was linked to an underlying body of evidence, reflecting judgments on the certainty of evidence, recommendation strength, values, preferences, and considerations of costs, feasibility, acceptability, and equity. Due to the paucity of evidence, the panel developed very low-quality GRADEd recommendations on monitoring patients with XLH based on an expert clinical practice survey. Using a rigorous narrative literature review, the panel developed non-GRADEd recommendations including guidance for pregnant women, patients with dental complications, and other areas where evidence is limited. This article summarizes the methodology utilized for the development of both GRADEd and non-GRADEd recommendations for patients with XLH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40119067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.