ArticleScientific reports2025
A decision-making framework for evaluating medical equipment suppliers under uncertainty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The procurement of medical equipment is a critical concern for healthcare organizations striving to deliver comprehensive patient care. Thus, the procurement process, including performance evaluation and selection of medical equipment suppliers, poses a significant challenge for healthcare organizations. The decision-making process also involves multiple decision-makers making subjective judgments about various quantitative and qualitative criteria for several alternative suppliers. This paper presents a framework for medical equipment supplier evaluation under uncertain assessment information by integrating rank order centroid (ROC) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP) techniques. The first stage involves identifying the key criteria influencing the performance evaluation of medical equipment suppliers for healthcare organizations. The ROC technique is used to assign weights to the important criteria, reducing uncertainty of weight assignment and subjective judgment information of the decision-makers. The fuzzy AHP method is then applied to evaluate and rank potential suppliers based on their overall performance. The approach is validated through a case study in a hospital setting, demonstrating the practical applicability of the proposed approach in a real-world scenario. Results indicate that the proposed hybrid method effectively supports group decision-making under uncertainty, providing healthcare organizations with a systematic and logical approach for selecting the most suitable medical equipment supplier. This framework enhances procurement efficiency and supports better resource allocation in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.