ArticleScientific reports2025
Potential impacts of microplastic pollution on soil-water-plant dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Conventional and biodegradable microplastics elicit contrasting taxon-level responses in rhizosphere microbiomes of maize and strawberry.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- Seasonal Variation of Microplastic Contamination in Landfill Leachate, River Water, and Soil During Premonsoon and Monsoon: First Evidence From Landfill Sites in Nepal.Journal of toxicology · 2026Article
- Microplastics in soil-plant systems: impacts on soil health, plant toxicity, and multiomics insights.Plant cell reports · 2025Review
- Do Microplastics in Soil Influence the Bioavailability of Sulfamethoxazole to Plants?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was designed to assess the potential impact of microplastic (MP) pollution on soil hydrology, specifically in retaining and releasing moisture. Herein, High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) MP of different sizes (i.e., 0.5-1, 1-3, and 3-5 mm) and shapes (i.e., fiber, film, and fragment) were evaluated for their effects on water retention curve (WRC) of sandy loam soil, chosen for its agricultural relevance and widespread environmental presence of HDPE. Nine contamination scenarios were simulated with a low MP pollution rate, 0.01% w/w. Van Genuchten models were used to assess plant available water (PAW), wilting point (WP), and water holding capacity (WHC). Results showed that studied MP could significantly affect WRC and PAW mainly by changing WHC rather than WP and that this effect varied with MP shape and size. According to the results, fragment MP had the greatest impact on soil WHC by increasing 36.3%, followed by fibers and films by 19.8% and 15.7%. MP particles significantly increased WHC, while WP remained relatively unchanged. An observed trend indicated that the impact on WHC increased with the size of the MP particles. These findings emphasize the need to manage soil MP pollution to protect plant growth, agriculture, and water dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.