Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119031›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Operando detection of dissolved oxygen in fluid solution using a submersible rapid scan EPR on a chip dipstick sensor.

Joseph E McPeak, Michele Segantini, Gianluca Marcozzi, Irene Dona, Silvio Künstner, Anh Chu, Michal Kern, Martin Poncelet, Benoit Driesschaert, Jens Anders and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joseph E McPeakBerlin Joint EPR Laboratory and EPR4Energy, Department Spins in Energy Conversion and Quantum Information Science (ASPIN), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Berlin, Germany. Joseph.mcpeak@helmholtz-berlin.de.
Michele SegantiniBerlin Joint EPR Laboratory and EPR4Energy, Department Spins in Energy Conversion and Quantum Information Science (ASPIN), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Gianluca MarcozziBerlin Joint EPR Laboratory and EPR4Energy, Department Spins in Energy Conversion and Quantum Information Science (ASPIN), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Irene DonaBerlin Joint EPR Laboratory and EPR4Energy, Department Spins in Energy Conversion and Quantum Information Science (ASPIN), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Silvio KünstnerBerlin Joint EPR Laboratory and EPR4Energy, Department Spins in Energy Conversion and Quantum Information Science (ASPIN), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Anh ChuInstitute of Smart Sensors, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Michal KernInstitute of Smart Sensors, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Martin PonceletDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Benoit DriesschaertDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Jens AndersInstitute of Smart Sensors, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Klaus LipsBerlin Joint EPR Laboratory and EPR4Energy, Department Spins in Energy Conversion and Quantum Information Science (ASPIN), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is an accurate and efficient technique to probe unpaired electrons in many applications across materials science, chemistry, and biology. Dynamic processes are investigated using EPR; however, these applications are limited by the use of resonator-based spectrometers such that the entire process must be confined to the resonator. The EPR-on-a-chip (EPRoC) device circumvents this limitation by integrating the entire EPR spectrometer into a single microchip. In this approach, the coil of a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) is used as the microwave source and detector simultaneously, operating under a protective coating such that the device may be placed in the sample solution directly. Additionally, improvements in sensitivity via rapid scan EPR (RS-EPR/RS-EPRoC) increase the accessible applications where SNR per measurement time is the fundamental limit. The herein reported device combines a dipstick EPRoC sensor with the enhanced sensitivity of frequency-swept frequency modulated rapid scan to measure triarylmethyl (trityl, Ox071) oxygen-sensitive probes dissolved in aqueous solutions. EPR spectra of Ox071 solutions were recorded using the RS-EPRoC sensor while varying the oxygen concentration of the solution between normal atmosphere and after purging the solution with nitrogen gas. We demonstrate that EPRoC may be employed to monitor dissolved oxygen in fluid solution in an online fashion.

Indexed as

DipstickEPR-on-a-chip (EPRoC)OperandoOximetryRapid scan EPRSensor

Identifiers

PMID40119031
PMCPMC11928686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.