Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119018›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The antioxidant activity of shaddock peel polysaccharides.

Bobo Lin, Gangliang Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bobo LinKey Laboratory of Carbohydrate Science and Engineering, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, 401331, China.
Gangliang HuangKey Laboratory of Carbohydrate Science and Engineering, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, 401331, China. huangdoctor226@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shaddock peel polysaccharide (SPP) has various biological activities. This explored its antioxidant activity. In vitro antioxidant tests, the two SPP components showed good DPPH, hydroxyl radical scavenging ability and anti-lipid peroxidation ability. At a concentration of 3.2 mg/mL, the anti-lipid peroxidation abilities of the two polysaccharides were 21.65% and 18.96%, respectively. SPP-3 had a slightly stronger ability to scavenge hydroxyl radicals than SPP-2. When the polysaccharide concentration reached 3.2 mg/mL, the order of the two polysaccharides' DPPH scavenging rates was SPP-2 > SPP-3. Therefore, SPP showed strong antioxidant activity and could be used in antioxidant-related applications in the future.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsFruitPolysaccharidesBiphenyl CompoundsFree Radical ScavengersHydroxyl RadicalLipid PeroxidationPicratesPlant Extracts1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazylAntioxidantsBiphenyl CompoundsFree Radical ScavengersHydroxyl RadicalPicratesPlant ExtractsPolysaccharidesAntioxidant activityComparisonShaddock peel polysaccharide

Identifiers

PMID40119018
PMCPMC11928447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.