ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Synthetic bone marrow images augment real samples in developing acute myeloid leukemia microscopy classification models.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable deep learning framework for multiclass bone marrow cytomorphology classification using EfficientNet and post hoc visualization techniques.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Next-generation synthetic trials in hematology with generative artificial intelligence.Leukemia · 2026Review
- Next Generation Digital Morphology: Blast Preclassification in Bone Marrow Aspirates.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Generating Brain MRI with StyleGAN2-ADA: The Effect of the Training Set Size on the Quality of Synthetic Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Multicentric data challenge for artificial intelligence-based classification of leukocytes: results from the CytologIA consortium.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-generated synthetic data for cancer research and clinical trials.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Deep learning in bone marrow cytomorphology: advances in segmentation, classification, and clinical translation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-quality image data is essential for training deep learning (DL) classifiers, yet data sharing is often limited by privacy concerns. We hypothesized that generative adversarial networks (GANs) could synthesize bone marrow smear (BMS) images suitable for classifier training. BMS from 1251 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 51 patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), and 236 stem cell donors were digitized, and synthetic images were generated using StyleGAN2-Ada. In a blinded visual Turing test, eight hematologists achieved 63% accuracy in identifying synthetic images, confirming high image quality. DL classifiers trained on real data achieved AUROCs of 0.99 across AML, APL, and donor classifications, with performance remaining above 0.95 even when incrementally substituting real data for synthetic samples. Adding synthetic data to real training data offered performance gains for an exceptionally rare disease (APL). Our study demonstrates the usability of synthetic BMS data for training highly accurate image classifiers in microscopy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.