ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Survival analysis and prediction of early-onset colorectal cancer patients post-chemotherapy: an analysis based on the SEER database.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- V7-DiVA: a feature-based Deep MIL colorectal whole-slide histopathology research platform with blinded external image-input validation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Tumor-Promoting Gut Microbes in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II early onset colorectal cancer: exploration and discovery using real-world data and the SEER database.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (EOCRC) has risen markedly in recent years, garnering widespread attention due to its distinctive clinical and biological features. However, systematic research on prognostic risk factors and long-term survival prediction for EOCRC patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy remains scarce. This study seeks to pinpoint critical prognostic factors for EOCRC patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy and to devise a survival prediction tool employing a Nomogram model.
methodsPatients diagnosed with EOCRC between 2010 and 2015, who underwent postoperative chemotherapy, were extracted from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database. Only those meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine independent risk factors influencing overall survival (OS). A Nomogram model was then developed using significant variables. The model's predictive accuracy and clinical utility were assessed through the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsA cohort of 9,205 patients was analyzed, with 6,445 randomly allocated to the training group and 2,760 to the validation group from the SEER database. Independent prognostic factors, including gender, race, marital status, primary tumor location, histological type, TNM stage, CEA levels, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, and lung metastasis, were identified through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. A Nomogram model constructed from these factors yielded a C-index of 0.76 (0.75, 0.77) in the training group and 0.76 (0.75, 0.78) in the validation group, reflecting robust discriminative ability and consistency. The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting 1-year OS was calculated as 0.84 (0.81, 0.86) in the training group and 0.82 (0.78, 0.85) in the validation group. For 3-year OS, AUCs were recorded at 0.83 (0.82, 0.84) and 0.82 (0.80, 0.84), respectively, while for 5-year OS, AUCs reached 0.81 (0.80, 0.82) and 0.82 (0.80, 0.84). Calibration curves demonstrated close alignment between predicted and observed survival rates. Additionally, DCA affirmed the model's clinical decision-making value.
conclusionPrognostic risk factors for EOCRC patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy were systematically evaluated in this study, leading to the development of a Nomogram-based survival prediction model. This tool offers a robust scientific foundation for tailoring individualized treatment and guiding follow-up strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.